Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
JNG

JPEG Network Graphics

image/x-jng
VS

X Bitmap (Legacy MIME Alias)

image/x-xbm
XBM

A complete technical comparison of JPEG Network Graphics and X Bitmap (Legacy MIME Alias) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature JNG XBM
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
JPEG Network Graphics
image/x-jng
Extension
.jng
Container PNG-style Chunk Structure (JHDR, JDAT, IDAT, IEND)
Compression Lossy (JPEG/DCT for color) / Lossless (Deflate for alpha mask)
Algorithm
JPEG (Discrete Cosine Transform)Deflate (LZ77)
Color Depth 8-bit, 12-bit, 24-bit (RGB), 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by MNG Development Group (Glenn Randers-Pehrson et al.)
Released 2001
Magic Bytes
8B 4A 4E 47 0D 0A 1A 0A
Full JNG reference →
X Bitmap (Legacy MIME Alias)
image/x-xbm
Extension
.xbm
Container C Source Code Header (.h)
Compression Uncompressed (Source Code)
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome)
Developed by MIT / X Consortium (X Window System)
Released 1988
Magic Bytes
23 64 65 66 69 6e 65 (ASCII '#define')
Full XBM reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser JNG XBM
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕
✓
JNG

JNG Strengths

  • Solved a massive technical hurdle in the early 2000s by combining high-compression lossy photographic data with crisp, 8-bit alpha transparency
  • Utilized the highly robust, extensible chunk-based architecture of the PNG format
  • Provided an excellent, bandwidth-saving alternative to massive 32-bit transparent PNGs for web design
Limitations
  • Failed to achieve critical mass; browser vendors largely abandoned the MNG/JNG standard due to implementation complexity
  • Completely obsolete today, having been superseded by natively supported, superior formats like WebP, AVIF, and HEIC
  • Decoding requires a hybrid engine that can parse PNG chunks while simultaneously decoding a JPEG stream and a Deflate stream, complicating software support
XBM

XBM Strengths

  • Can be compiled directly into C or C++ source code without needing an external file loader or binary asset manager
  • Human-readable structure allows developers to inspect, edit, or hand-craft tiny icons directly within a text editor
  • Extremely predictable and lightweight for 1-bit hardware displays and embedded systems
Limitations
  • Strictly limited to 1-bit monochrome (black and white) graphics with no gray or color support
  • Text-based C syntax creates massive file bloat compared to binary 1-bit formats like PBM
  • Completely deprecated in modern web browsers and desktop GUI frameworks

When to choose which format

JNG
Use JNG when…
  • Embedded frames in MNG animations
  • Historical web graphics requiring lossy compression with transparency
XBM
Use XBM when…
  • X Window System (X11) Cursors and Icons
  • Embedded C/C++ Firmware UI Assets
  • Early 1990s Unix Web Graphics

More comparisons

JNG vs ACES → XBM vs ACES → JNG vs APNG → XBM vs APNG → JNG vs AVCI → XBM vs AVCI → JNG vs AVCS → XBM vs AVCS → JNG vs AVIF → XBM vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison