Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
JNG

JPEG Network Graphics

image/x-jng
VS

Portable Pixmap

image/x-portable-pixmap
PPM

A complete technical comparison of JPEG Network Graphics and Portable Pixmap — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature JNG PPM
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
JPEG Network Graphics
image/x-jng
Extension
.jng
Container PNG-style Chunk Structure (JHDR, JDAT, IDAT, IEND)
Compression Lossy (JPEG/DCT for color) / Lossless (Deflate for alpha mask)
Algorithm
JPEG (Discrete Cosine Transform)Deflate (LZ77)
Color Depth 8-bit, 12-bit, 24-bit (RGB), 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by MNG Development Group (Glenn Randers-Pehrson et al.)
Released 2001
Magic Bytes
8B 4A 4E 47 0D 0A 1A 0A
Full JNG reference →
Portable Pixmap
image/x-portable-pixmap
Extension
.ppm
Container Netpbm
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 24-bit (RGB), 48-bit (RGB High Color)
Developed by Jef Poskanzer (Netpbm Project)
Released 1988
Magic Bytes
50 33 (ASCII) or 50 36 (Binary)
Full PPM reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser JNG PPM
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
JNG

JNG Strengths

  • Solved a massive technical hurdle in the early 2000s by combining high-compression lossy photographic data with crisp, 8-bit alpha transparency
  • Utilized the highly robust, extensible chunk-based architecture of the PNG format
  • Provided an excellent, bandwidth-saving alternative to massive 32-bit transparent PNGs for web design
Limitations
  • Failed to achieve critical mass; browser vendors largely abandoned the MNG/JNG standard due to implementation complexity
  • Completely obsolete today, having been superseded by natively supported, superior formats like WebP, AVIF, and HEIC
  • Decoding requires a hybrid engine that can parse PNG chunks while simultaneously decoding a JPEG stream and a Deflate stream, complicating software support
PPM

PPM Strengths

  • Absolute structural simplicity allows parsers and renderers (such as custom raytracers) to write directly to the format with virtually no overhead or external libraries
  • Supports 16-bit per channel (48-bit total) precision, preserving deep color accuracy before converting to final delivery formats
  • ASCII encoding ('P3') allows manual editing and visual inspection of RGB values directly within a text editor
Limitations
  • Zero compression results in astronomical file sizes, making it entirely impractical for web delivery or consumer storage
  • Does not natively support an alpha channel for transparency (this is handled by the newer PAM extension format within the Netpbm suite)
  • Lacks support for modern metadata standards like EXIF, XMP, or embedded ICC color profiles

When to choose which format

JNG
Use JNG when…
  • Embedded frames in MNG animations
  • Historical web graphics requiring lossy compression with transparency
PPM
Use PPM when…
  • Intermediary Format for Image Format Conversion
  • Academic Computer Graphics and Raytracing Output
  • Unix/Linux Command-Line Image Pipelines

More comparisons

JNG vs ACES → PPM vs ACES → JNG vs APNG → PPM vs APNG → JNG vs AVCI → PPM vs AVCI → JNG vs AVCS → PPM vs AVCS → JNG vs AVIF → PPM vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison