Image MIME Reference
IEF
Image Exchange Format
image/ief
VS
Windows Metafile
image/x-wmf
WMF
A complete technical comparison of Image Exchange Format and Windows Metafile — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | IEF | WMF |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
Image Exchange Format
image/ief
Extension
.ief
Container
TIFF Class B (TIFF-B)
Compression
Lossless (MH, MR, MMR) / Uncompressed
Algorithm
MHMRMMRUncompressed
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome)
Developed by
IETF Network Fax Working Group
Released
1992
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 (Little-endian) / 4D 4D 00 2A (Big-endian)
Windows Metafile
image/x-wmf
Extension
.wmf.emf
Container
Windows GDI Metafile Command Stream
Compression
Uncompressed (Command Stream)
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
Varies based on GDI rendering engine
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
1990
Magic Bytes
D7 CD C6 9A (Aldus Placeable Metafile Header) or 01 00 09 00 (Standard WMF Header)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | IEF | WMF |
|---|---|---|
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ |
✓
|
IEF
IEF Strengths
- Provided a standard method for exchanging bi-level fax images during the early days of the Internet
- Supported multi-page documents
- Leveraged the highly resilient and well-documented TIFF container
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern computing environments
- Strictly limited to 1-bit monochrome data, lacking color or grayscale capabilities
- Magic bytes overlap completely with standard TIFF, making specific filetype detection difficult without parsing internal tags
WMF
WMF Strengths
- Infinitely scalable vector format that remains remarkably compact for simple geometric illustrations and charts
- Historically served as a seamless conduit for copying and pasting vector graphics between disparate Windows applications via the system clipboard
Limitations
- Notoriously plagued by historic security vulnerabilities, making raw WMF parsing a vector for exploits in legacy software
- Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern web environments (browsers cannot render them)
- Strictly tied to the Windows GDI architecture, making cross-platform rendering inconsistent across Linux and macOS
When to choose which format
IEF
Use IEF when…
- Legacy Fax Transmissions
- Early Internet Gateways
- Archival
WMF
Use WMF when…
- Legacy Microsoft Office Clip Art and Icons
- Windows GDI Graphics Export
- Early Windows Desktop Publishing