Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
IEF

Image Exchange Format

image/ief
VS

SealedMedia SoftSeal GIF

image/vnd.sealedmedia.softseal.gif
SoftSeal-GIF

A complete technical comparison of Image Exchange Format and SealedMedia SoftSeal GIF — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature IEF SoftSeal-GIF
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
Image Exchange Format
image/ief
Extension
.ief
Container TIFF Class B (TIFF-B)
Compression Lossless (MH, MR, MMR) / Uncompressed
Algorithm
MHMRMMRUncompressed
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome)
Developed by IETF Network Fax Working Group
Released 1992
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 (Little-endian) / 4D 4D 00 2A (Big-endian)
Full IEF reference →
SealedMedia SoftSeal GIF
image/vnd.sealedmedia.softseal.gif
Extension
.sgif.sealed-gif
Container SealedMedia SoftSeal Wrapper
Compression Encrypted Payload (LZW)
Algorithm
AES EncryptionLZW (Internal GIF payload)
Color Depth Encrypted Payload (Historically up to 8-bit Indexed)
Developed by SealedMedia (Acquired by Oracle Corporation)
Released Late 1990s
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary SealedMedia Container)
Full SoftSeal-GIF reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser IEF SoftSeal-GIF
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
IEF

IEF Strengths

  • Provided a standard method for exchanging bi-level fax images during the early days of the Internet
  • Supported multi-page documents
  • Leveraged the highly resilient and well-documented TIFF container
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern computing environments
  • Strictly limited to 1-bit monochrome data, lacking color or grayscale capabilities
  • Magic bytes overlap completely with standard TIFF, making specific filetype detection difficult without parsing internal tags
SoftSeal-GIF

SoftSeal-GIF Strengths

  • Provided robust, persistent security that traveled with the file, ensuring images could not be leaked even if sent outside the corporate firewall
  • Enabled dynamic revocation, meaning administrators could instantly kill access to a file globally
Limitations
  • Completely proprietary and dependent on an active authentication server; if the DRM server dies, the image is permanently locked
  • Zero support in modern operating systems, web browsers, or standard image editing suites without heavy enterprise client installations
  • Often caused massive friction for legitimate end-users trying to view documents

When to choose which format

IEF
Use IEF when…
  • Legacy Fax Transmissions
  • Early Internet Gateways
  • Archival
SoftSeal-GIF
Use SoftSeal-GIF when…
  • Enterprise Information Rights Management (IRM)
  • Secure Distribution of Corporate Assets
  • Revocable Medical, Legal, or Financial Imaging
Share this comparison