Image MIME Reference
IEF
Image Exchange Format
image/ief
VS
RealNetworks RealPix
image/vnd.rn-realpix
RealPix
A complete technical comparison of Image Exchange Format and RealNetworks RealPix — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | IEF | RealPix |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
Image Exchange Format
image/ief
Extension
.ief
Container
TIFF Class B (TIFF-B)
Compression
Lossless (MH, MR, MMR) / Uncompressed
Algorithm
MHMRMMRUncompressed
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome)
Developed by
IETF Network Fax Working Group
Released
1992
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 (Little-endian) / 4D 4D 00 2A (Big-endian)
RealNetworks RealPix
image/vnd.rn-realpix
Extension
.rp
Container
IMFL (XML Markup)
Compression
Uncompressed (Plain Text Markup)
Algorithm
None (Plain Text)
Color Depth
Dependent on referenced images
Developed by
RealNetworks
Released
1998
Magic Bytes
3C 69 6D 66 6C
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | IEF | RealPix |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
IEF
IEF Strengths
- Provided a standard method for exchanging bi-level fax images during the early days of the Internet
- Supported multi-page documents
- Leveraged the highly resilient and well-documented TIFF container
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern computing environments
- Strictly limited to 1-bit monochrome data, lacking color or grayscale capabilities
- Magic bytes overlap completely with standard TIFF, making specific filetype detection difficult without parsing internal tags
RealPix
RealPix Strengths
- Allowed for 'Ken Burns'-style animated slideshows at a fraction of the bandwidth required for actual video, crucial for 1990s dial-up connections
- Plain text XML architecture made it easy for developers and hobbyists to hand-code complex multimedia presentations
- Perfectly synchronized with RealAudio streams using SMIL-like timing parameters
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and heavily reliant on the proprietary, defunct RealPlayer browser plugin
- Not a true image format, causing confusion when handled by standard image processing libraries which expect binary pixel data
- Lacks modern CSS or HTML5 canvas equivalents without completely rewriting the presentation logic
When to choose which format
IEF
Use IEF when…
- Legacy Fax Transmissions
- Early Internet Gateways
- Archival
RealPix
Use RealPix when…
- Historical Dial-up Streaming Presentations
- RealPlayer Slideshows
- Bandwidth-efficient 'Video' Alternatives (late 1990s)