Image MIME Reference
IEF
Image Exchange Format
image/ief
VS
Portable Anymap
image/x-portable-anymap
PNM
A complete technical comparison of Image Exchange Format and Portable Anymap — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | IEF | PNM |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
Image Exchange Format
image/ief
Extension
.ief
Container
TIFF Class B (TIFF-B)
Compression
Lossless (MH, MR, MMR) / Uncompressed
Algorithm
MHMRMMRUncompressed
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome)
Developed by
IETF Network Fax Working Group
Released
1992
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 (Little-endian) / 4D 4D 00 2A (Big-endian)
Portable Anymap
image/x-portable-anymap
Extension
.pnm
Container
Netpbm
Compression
Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
1-bit (PBM), 8-bit to 16-bit (PGM), 24-bit to 48-bit (PPM)
Developed by
Jef Poskanzer (Netpbm Project)
Released
1988
Magic Bytes
50 31, 50 32, 50 33, 50 34, 50 35, or 50 36
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | IEF | PNM |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
IEF
IEF Strengths
- Provided a standard method for exchanging bi-level fax images during the early days of the Internet
- Supported multi-page documents
- Leveraged the highly resilient and well-documented TIFF container
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern computing environments
- Strictly limited to 1-bit monochrome data, lacking color or grayscale capabilities
- Magic bytes overlap completely with standard TIFF, making specific filetype detection difficult without parsing internal tags
PNM
PNM Strengths
- Unparalleled simplicity: parsers and writers for PNM files can be written from scratch in C or Python in just a few minutes without relying on external libraries
- Serves as an excellent foundational teaching tool for computer science students learning about image arrays and raster graphics
- Flawlessly pipes through Unix command-line utilities for robust automated image processing (via the Netpbm suite)
Limitations
- Zero compression natively results in astronomical file sizes, making it entirely impractical for web delivery or consumer storage
- No support for standard metadata formats like EXIF, XMP, or ICC color profiles
- No native alpha channel support in the classic PNM specification (though the newer PAM format 'P7' addresses this)
When to choose which format
IEF
Use IEF when…
- Legacy Fax Transmissions
- Early Internet Gateways
- Archival
PNM
Use PNM when…
- Unix/Linux Command-Line Image Processing (Netpbm suite)
- Academic Computer Vision Research
- Intermediary Format for Image Format Conversion