Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
ICO

Windows Icon (Legacy MIME)

image/x-icon
VS

AutoCAD Slide

image/vnd.sld
SLD

A complete technical comparison of Windows Icon (Legacy MIME) and AutoCAD Slide — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

ICO wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature ICO SLD
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
Windows Icon (Legacy MIME)
image/x-icon
Extension
.ico
Container ICO Directory Structure
Compression Uncompressed (DIB/BMP) / Deflate (Embedded PNG)
Algorithm
NoneDeflate (via PNG)
Color Depth 1-bit, 4-bit, 8-bit, 24-bit (True Color), 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by Microsoft Corporation
Released 1985
Magic Bytes
00 00 01 00
Full ICO reference →
AutoCAD Slide
image/vnd.sld
Extension
.sld
Container AutoCAD Slide Container
Compression Uncompressed (Vector Instructions)
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 8-bit (AutoCAD Indexed Color)
Developed by Autodesk, Inc.
Released 1980s
Magic Bytes
41 75 74 6F 43 41 44 20 53 6C 69 64 65 0D 0A 1A 00
Full SLD reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser ICO SLD
Chrome Chrome
✓ 1
 ✕
Firefox Firefox
✓ 1
 ✕
Safari Safari
✓ 1
 ✕
Edge Edge
✓ 12
 ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✓
 ✕
ICO

ICO Strengths

  • Universally supported by every web browser in existence for website favicons
  • Packs multiple resolutions into a single file, eliminating the need to serve different files for the taskbar vs. the desktop
  • Modern support for embedded PNGs (since Windows Vista) allows for excellent 32-bit transparency (alpha channels) and drastically reduced file sizes
Limitations
  • Internal file structure is convoluted due to decades of legacy cruft, such as the requirement for BMP data to lack a standard file header but double the height property for an archaic XOR/AND mask
  • Larger file size compared to a single optimized PNG or SVG, as it literally stores the same image multiple times at different scales
  • The MIME type landscape is highly fragmented (x-icon vs. vnd.microsoft.icon), causing occasional caching or strict-MIME validation errors on restrictive servers
SLD

SLD Strengths

  • Allowed for instantaneous loading of highly complex architectural and engineering blueprints on low-memory MS-DOS systems
  • Easy-to-parse binary structure containing simple opcodes for drawing vectors and polygons
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and heavily fragmented, largely replaced by PDF and lightweight web-based DXF viewers
  • Destructive 'snapshot' format irrevocably strips all useful, editable CAD geometry data from the original drawing
  • Zero support in web browsers or standard image processing libraries

When to choose which format

ICO
Use ICO when…
  • Website Favicons (favicon.ico)
  • Windows Application Executable Icons (.exe)
  • Desktop Shortcut Icons
SLD
Use SLD when…
  • Legacy AutoCAD Slideshows
  • AutoCAD Custom Icon Menus
  • Historical CAD Archival

More comparisons

ICO vs ACES → SLD vs ACES → ICO vs APNG → SLD vs APNG → ICO vs AVCI → SLD vs AVCI → ICO vs AVCS → SLD vs AVCS → ICO vs AVIF → SLD vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison