Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
ICO

Windows Icon (Legacy MIME)

image/x-icon
VS

North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax

image/naplps
NAPLPS

A complete technical comparison of Windows Icon (Legacy MIME) and North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

ICO wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature ICO NAPLPS
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No Yes
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
Windows Icon (Legacy MIME)
image/x-icon
Extension
.ico
Container ICO Directory Structure
Compression Uncompressed (DIB/BMP) / Deflate (Embedded PNG)
Algorithm
NoneDeflate (via PNG)
Color Depth 1-bit, 4-bit, 8-bit, 24-bit (True Color), 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by Microsoft Corporation
Released 1985
Magic Bytes
00 00 01 00
Full ICO reference →
North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax
image/naplps
Extension
.nap.naplps
Container NAPLPS Byte Stream
Compression Uncompressed (Tokenized ASCII Commands)
Algorithm
None (Coordinate encoding)
Color Depth 16-color palette (Indexed from larger color spaces)
Developed by ANSI / CSA (Based on Canadian CRC's Telidon)
Released 1983
Magic Bytes
1B (Variable / ESC sequences)
Full NAPLPS reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser ICO NAPLPS
Chrome Chrome
✓ 1
 ✕
Firefox Firefox
✓ 1
 ✕
Safari Safari
✓ 1
 ✕
Edge Edge
✓ 12
 ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✓
 ✕
ICO

ICO Strengths

  • Universally supported by every web browser in existence for website favicons
  • Packs multiple resolutions into a single file, eliminating the need to serve different files for the taskbar vs. the desktop
  • Modern support for embedded PNGs (since Windows Vista) allows for excellent 32-bit transparency (alpha channels) and drastically reduced file sizes
Limitations
  • Internal file structure is convoluted due to decades of legacy cruft, such as the requirement for BMP data to lack a standard file header but double the height property for an archaic XOR/AND mask
  • Larger file size compared to a single optimized PNG or SVG, as it literally stores the same image multiple times at different scales
  • The MIME type landscape is highly fragmented (x-icon vs. vnd.microsoft.icon), causing occasional caching or strict-MIME validation errors on restrictive servers
NAPLPS

NAPLPS Strengths

  • Extremely bandwidth-efficient, enabling colorful graphical interfaces over early 300 baud dial-up connections
  • Resolution-independent vector scaling allowed the exact same file to be displayed accurately on varied early PC monitors and television sets
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported by modern web technologies
  • Relies heavily on stateful parsing and terminal emulators rather than straightforward file decoding
  • Easily misidentified by MIME sniffers as plain text or generic binary streams due to the lack of a standardized file header

When to choose which format

ICO
Use ICO when…
  • Website Favicons (favicon.ico)
  • Windows Application Executable Icons (.exe)
  • Desktop Shortcut Icons
NAPLPS
Use NAPLPS when…
  • 1980s Videotex Services
  • Prodigy Online Service Graphics
  • Historical BBS Terminal Graphics
  • Legacy Teletext Broadcasts

More comparisons

ICO vs ACES → NAPLPS vs ACES → ICO vs APNG → NAPLPS vs APNG → ICO vs AVCI → NAPLPS vs AVCI → ICO vs AVCS → NAPLPS vs AVCS → ICO vs AVIF → NAPLPS vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison