Image MIME Reference
ICO
Windows Icon (Legacy MIME)
image/x-icon
VS
JPEG-LS
image/jls
JPEG-LS
A complete technical comparison of Windows Icon (Legacy MIME) and JPEG-LS — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
ICO wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | ICO | JPEG-LS |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
Windows Icon (Legacy MIME)
image/x-icon
Extension
.ico
Container
ICO Directory Structure
Compression
Uncompressed (DIB/BMP) / Deflate (Embedded PNG)
Algorithm
NoneDeflate (via PNG)
Color Depth
1-bit, 4-bit, 8-bit, 24-bit (True Color), 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
1985
Magic Bytes
00 00 01 00
JPEG-LS
image/jls
Extension
.jls.jl
Container
JPEG Bitstream
Compression
Lossless / Near-Lossless (Predictive Coding)
Algorithm
LOCO-I (Low Complexity Lossless Compression for Images)Golomb-Rice Coding
Color Depth
8-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (ISO/ITU-T) & HP Labs
Released
1999
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF F7
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | ICO | JPEG-LS |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✓ 1
|
✕ |
Firefox
|
✓ 1
|
✕ |
Safari
|
✓ 1
|
✕ |
Edge
|
✓ 12
|
✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✓
|
✕ |
ICO
ICO Strengths
- Universally supported by every web browser in existence for website favicons
- Packs multiple resolutions into a single file, eliminating the need to serve different files for the taskbar vs. the desktop
- Modern support for embedded PNGs (since Windows Vista) allows for excellent 32-bit transparency (alpha channels) and drastically reduced file sizes
Limitations
- Internal file structure is convoluted due to decades of legacy cruft, such as the requirement for BMP data to lack a standard file header but double the height property for an archaic XOR/AND mask
- Larger file size compared to a single optimized PNG or SVG, as it literally stores the same image multiple times at different scales
- The MIME type landscape is highly fragmented (x-icon vs. vnd.microsoft.icon), causing occasional caching or strict-MIME validation errors on restrictive servers
JPEG-LS
JPEG-LS Strengths
- Provides state-of-the-art lossless compression ratios for continuous-tone images, often outperforming Lossless JPEG and JPEG 2000
- Extremely fast and computationally inexpensive to encode/decode, requiring no complex floating-point math or DCTs
- Highly resilient in constrained hardware environments, making it ideal for medical equipment and deep-space probes (e.g., Mars rovers)
Limitations
- Zero native support in web browsers or standard consumer operating systems
- Lacks the advanced resolution scalability and progressive decoding features found in JPEG 2000
- Primarily relegated to niche enterprise sectors (healthcare/DICOM and aerospace) rather than consumer adoption
When to choose which format
ICO
Use ICO when…
- Website Favicons (favicon.ico)
- Windows Application Executable Icons (.exe)
- Desktop Shortcut Icons
JPEG-LS
Use JPEG-LS when…
- Medical Imaging (DICOM Encapsulation)
- Space and Planetary Imaging (NASA/ESA)
- Industrial Machine Vision
- Scientific Archival Storage