Image MIME Reference
ICO
Windows Icon (Legacy MIME)
image/x-icon
VS
JPEG 2000 Core Image File
image/jp2
JPEG-2000
A complete technical comparison of Windows Icon (Legacy MIME) and JPEG 2000 Core Image File — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
ICO wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | ICO | JPEG-2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
Windows Icon (Legacy MIME)
image/x-icon
Extension
.ico
Container
ICO Directory Structure
Compression
Uncompressed (DIB/BMP) / Deflate (Embedded PNG)
Algorithm
NoneDeflate (via PNG)
Color Depth
1-bit, 4-bit, 8-bit, 24-bit (True Color), 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
1985
Magic Bytes
00 00 01 00
JPEG 2000 Core Image File
image/jp2
Extension
.jp2.j2k.jpf.jpx.jpm
Container
JP2 (ISO/IEC 15444-1)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group
Released
2000
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | ICO | JPEG-2000 |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✓ 1
|
✕ |
Firefox
|
✓ 1
|
✕ |
Safari
|
✓ 1
|
✓ 5+
|
Edge
|
✓ 12
|
✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✓
|
✕ |
ICO
ICO Strengths
- Universally supported by every web browser in existence for website favicons
- Packs multiple resolutions into a single file, eliminating the need to serve different files for the taskbar vs. the desktop
- Modern support for embedded PNGs (since Windows Vista) allows for excellent 32-bit transparency (alpha channels) and drastically reduced file sizes
Limitations
- Internal file structure is convoluted due to decades of legacy cruft, such as the requirement for BMP data to lack a standard file header but double the height property for an archaic XOR/AND mask
- Larger file size compared to a single optimized PNG or SVG, as it literally stores the same image multiple times at different scales
- The MIME type landscape is highly fragmented (x-icon vs. vnd.microsoft.icon), causing occasional caching or strict-MIME validation errors on restrictive servers
JPEG-2000
JPEG-2000 Strengths
- Superior compression efficiency over baseline JPEG without introducing blocking artifacts
- True mathematically lossless compression available in the same format
- Extremely scalable: a single file can be decoded at various resolutions (thumbnails to full size) without loading the entire file
Limitations
- Very poor native web browser support prevents it from being a web standard
- High computational complexity makes encoding and decoding significantly slower than JPEG
- Early patent concerns and complex licensing hindered its initial adoption rate
When to choose which format
ICO
Use ICO when…
- Website Favicons (favicon.ico)
- Windows Application Executable Icons (.exe)
- Desktop Shortcut Icons
JPEG-2000
Use JPEG-2000 when…
- Digital Cinema (DCP)
- Medical Imaging (DICOM)
- Geospatial Data
- Archival Preservation