Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
HTJ2K-Codestream

High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream

image/jphc
VS

RealNetworks RealPix

image/vnd.rn-realpix
RealPix

A complete technical comparison of High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream and RealNetworks RealPix — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature HTJ2K-Codestream RealPix
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support ✕ No Yes
Progressive Loading Yes Yes
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream
image/jphc
Extension
.jhc
Container None (Raw Codestream)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2019
Magic Bytes
FF 4F FF 51
Full HTJ2K-Codestream reference →
RealNetworks RealPix
image/vnd.rn-realpix
Extension
.rp
Container IMFL (XML Markup)
Compression Uncompressed (Plain Text Markup)
Algorithm
None (Plain Text)
Color Depth Dependent on referenced images
Developed by RealNetworks
Released 1998
Magic Bytes
3C 69 6D 66 6C
Full RealPix reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser HTJ2K-Codestream RealPix
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
HTJ2K-Codestream

HTJ2K-Codestream Strengths

  • Extremely fast encoding and decoding capabilities due to the parallelizable block coder
  • Minimal file overhead since it lacks container headers and metadata
  • Ideal for streaming applications or embedded systems where parsing a full container is unnecessary
Limitations
  • Lacks standard metadata support (like EXIF, XMP, or ICC color profiles) since there is no container structure
  • Zero native web browser compatibility
  • Difficult to distinguish from standard JPEG 2000 codestreams without deeply parsing the internal marker segments
RealPix

RealPix Strengths

  • Allowed for 'Ken Burns'-style animated slideshows at a fraction of the bandwidth required for actual video, crucial for 1990s dial-up connections
  • Plain text XML architecture made it easy for developers and hobbyists to hand-code complex multimedia presentations
  • Perfectly synchronized with RealAudio streams using SMIL-like timing parameters
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and heavily reliant on the proprietary, defunct RealPlayer browser plugin
  • Not a true image format, causing confusion when handled by standard image processing libraries which expect binary pixel data
  • Lacks modern CSS or HTML5 canvas equivalents without completely rewriting the presentation logic

When to choose which format

HTJ2K-Codestream
Use HTJ2K-Codestream when…
  • Medical Imaging Pipelines
  • Geospatial Data Streaming
  • Digital Cinema
  • Embedded Systems
RealPix
Use RealPix when…
  • Historical Dial-up Streaming Presentations
  • RealPlayer Slideshows
  • Bandwidth-efficient 'Video' Alternatives (late 1990s)
Share this comparison