Image MIME Reference
HTJ2K-(JPH)
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image
image/jph
VS
Windows Metafile
image/x-wmf
WMF
A complete technical comparison of High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image and Windows Metafile — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | HTJ2K-(JPH) | WMF |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image
image/jph
Extension
.jph
Container
JPH (ISO/IEC 15444-15)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2019
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 68 20
Windows Metafile
image/x-wmf
Extension
.wmf.emf
Container
Windows GDI Metafile Command Stream
Compression
Uncompressed (Command Stream)
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
Varies based on GDI rendering engine
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
1990
Magic Bytes
D7 CD C6 9A (Aldus Placeable Metafile Header) or 01 00 09 00 (Standard WMF Header)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | HTJ2K-(JPH) | WMF |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ |
✓
|
HTJ2K-(JPH)
HTJ2K-(JPH) Strengths
- Delivers orders of magnitude faster encoding and decoding than standard JPEG 2000 by utilizing a new, parallelizable block coder
- Supports mathematically lossless and lossy compression within the same codestream architecture
- Allows for resolution scalability, progressive decoding, and region-of-interest extraction without needing to decode the entire image
Limitations
- Zero native web browser support, requiring specialized libraries, API conversions, or WebAssembly (like OpenJPH.js) for web deployment
- Lack of broad consumer awareness, keeping it confined to professional, medical, and scientific workflows
- Requires more advanced software ecosystems to decode than ubiquitous formats like JPEG or WebP
WMF
WMF Strengths
- Infinitely scalable vector format that remains remarkably compact for simple geometric illustrations and charts
- Historically served as a seamless conduit for copying and pasting vector graphics between disparate Windows applications via the system clipboard
Limitations
- Notoriously plagued by historic security vulnerabilities, making raw WMF parsing a vector for exploits in legacy software
- Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern web environments (browsers cannot render them)
- Strictly tied to the Windows GDI architecture, making cross-platform rendering inconsistent across Linux and macOS
When to choose which format
HTJ2K-(JPH)
Use HTJ2K-(JPH) when…
- Medical Imaging (DICOM)
- Geospatial Data
- Digital Cinema
- Professional Archiving
WMF
Use WMF when…
- Legacy Microsoft Office Clip Art and Icons
- Windows GDI Graphics Export
- Early Windows Desktop Publishing