Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
HTJ2K-(JPH)

High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image

image/jph
VS

SealedMedia SoftSeal GIF

image/vnd.sealedmedia.softseal.gif
SoftSeal-GIF

A complete technical comparison of High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image and SealedMedia SoftSeal GIF — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature HTJ2K-(JPH) SoftSeal-GIF
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image
image/jph
Extension
.jph
Container JPH (ISO/IEC 15444-15)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2019
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 68 20
Full HTJ2K-(JPH) reference →
SealedMedia SoftSeal GIF
image/vnd.sealedmedia.softseal.gif
Extension
.sgif.sealed-gif
Container SealedMedia SoftSeal Wrapper
Compression Encrypted Payload (LZW)
Algorithm
AES EncryptionLZW (Internal GIF payload)
Color Depth Encrypted Payload (Historically up to 8-bit Indexed)
Developed by SealedMedia (Acquired by Oracle Corporation)
Released Late 1990s
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary SealedMedia Container)
Full SoftSeal-GIF reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser HTJ2K-(JPH) SoftSeal-GIF
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
HTJ2K-(JPH)

HTJ2K-(JPH) Strengths

  • Delivers orders of magnitude faster encoding and decoding than standard JPEG 2000 by utilizing a new, parallelizable block coder
  • Supports mathematically lossless and lossy compression within the same codestream architecture
  • Allows for resolution scalability, progressive decoding, and region-of-interest extraction without needing to decode the entire image
Limitations
  • Zero native web browser support, requiring specialized libraries, API conversions, or WebAssembly (like OpenJPH.js) for web deployment
  • Lack of broad consumer awareness, keeping it confined to professional, medical, and scientific workflows
  • Requires more advanced software ecosystems to decode than ubiquitous formats like JPEG or WebP
SoftSeal-GIF

SoftSeal-GIF Strengths

  • Provided robust, persistent security that traveled with the file, ensuring images could not be leaked even if sent outside the corporate firewall
  • Enabled dynamic revocation, meaning administrators could instantly kill access to a file globally
Limitations
  • Completely proprietary and dependent on an active authentication server; if the DRM server dies, the image is permanently locked
  • Zero support in modern operating systems, web browsers, or standard image editing suites without heavy enterprise client installations
  • Often caused massive friction for legitimate end-users trying to view documents

When to choose which format

HTJ2K-(JPH)
Use HTJ2K-(JPH) when…
  • Medical Imaging (DICOM)
  • Geospatial Data
  • Digital Cinema
  • Professional Archiving
SoftSeal-GIF
Use SoftSeal-GIF when…
  • Enterprise Information Rights Management (IRM)
  • Secure Distribution of Corporate Assets
  • Revocable Medical, Legal, or Financial Imaging

More comparisons

HTJ2K-(JPH) vs ACES → SoftSeal-GIF vs ACES → HTJ2K-(JPH) vs APNG → SoftSeal-GIF vs APNG → HTJ2K-(JPH) vs AVCI → SoftSeal-GIF vs AVCI → HTJ2K-(JPH) vs AVCS → SoftSeal-GIF vs AVCS → HTJ2K-(JPH) vs AVIF → SoftSeal-GIF vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison