Image MIME Reference
HTJ2K-(JPH)
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image
image/jph
VS
PWG Raster Format
image/pwg-raster
PWG-Raster
A complete technical comparison of High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image and PWG Raster Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | HTJ2K-(JPH) | PWG-Raster |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image
image/jph
Extension
.jph
Container
JPH (ISO/IEC 15444-15)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2019
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 68 20
PWG Raster Format
image/pwg-raster
Extension
.pwg.ras
Container
CUPS Raster v2 Container
Compression
PackBits (Run-Length Encoding)
Algorithm
PackBits (Apple RLE variant)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome/K), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (sRGB / Adobe RGB), 32-bit (CMYK)
Developed by
IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group (PWG)
Released
2011
Magic Bytes
52 61 53 32
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | HTJ2K-(JPH) | PWG-Raster |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
HTJ2K-(JPH)
HTJ2K-(JPH) Strengths
- Delivers orders of magnitude faster encoding and decoding than standard JPEG 2000 by utilizing a new, parallelizable block coder
- Supports mathematically lossless and lossy compression within the same codestream architecture
- Allows for resolution scalability, progressive decoding, and region-of-interest extraction without needing to decode the entire image
Limitations
- Zero native web browser support, requiring specialized libraries, API conversions, or WebAssembly (like OpenJPH.js) for web deployment
- Lack of broad consumer awareness, keeping it confined to professional, medical, and scientific workflows
- Requires more advanced software ecosystems to decode than ubiquitous formats like JPEG or WebP
PWG-Raster
PWG-Raster Strengths
- The undisputed global standard for modern, driverless printing environments, eliminating the nightmare of installing manufacturer-specific print drivers
- Extremely lightweight to decode on embedded hardware, requiring minimal RAM buffers on the printer side
- Strict color space and resolution rules guarantee that the printed output will successfully process without syntax errors
Limitations
- Generates massive file sizes and network payloads compared to vector-based formats like PDF or PostScript, as every page is fully rasterized at 300+ DPI before transmission
- No support for native rendering in web browsers, image viewers, or graphic design software without specialized CUPS developer tools
- Cannot store complex metadata, vector text, or layers
When to choose which format
HTJ2K-(JPH)
Use HTJ2K-(JPH) when…
- Medical Imaging (DICOM)
- Geospatial Data
- Digital Cinema
- Professional Archiving
PWG-Raster
Use PWG-Raster when…
- Driverless Network Printing (IPP Everywhere)
- Apple AirPrint and Mopria Print Service Pipelines
- CUPS (Common UNIX Printing System) Spooling