Image MIME Reference
HTJ2K-(JPH)
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image
image/jph
VS
Progressive JPEG (Legacy IE Alias)
image/pjpeg
PJPEG
A complete technical comparison of High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image and Progressive JPEG (Legacy IE Alias) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
PJPEG wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | HTJ2K-(JPH) | PJPEG |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | Yes |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | Yes |
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image
image/jph
Extension
.jph
Container
JPH (ISO/IEC 15444-15)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2019
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 68 20
Progressive JPEG (Legacy IE Alias)
image/pjpeg
Extension
.jpeg.jpg.pjpeg.pjp.jfif
Container
JPEG (ISO/IEC 10918-1)
Compression
Lossy (DCT)
Algorithm
Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT)
Color Depth
8-bit, 12-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group / Microsoft (Alias)
Released
1992
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF E0 (JFIF) / FF D8 FF E1 (Exif)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | HTJ2K-(JPH) | PJPEG |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ |
✓ All
|
Firefox
|
✕ |
✓ All
|
Safari
|
✕ |
✓ All
|
Edge
|
✕ |
✓ All
|
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ |
✓
|
HTJ2K-(JPH)
HTJ2K-(JPH) Strengths
- Delivers orders of magnitude faster encoding and decoding than standard JPEG 2000 by utilizing a new, parallelizable block coder
- Supports mathematically lossless and lossy compression within the same codestream architecture
- Allows for resolution scalability, progressive decoding, and region-of-interest extraction without needing to decode the entire image
Limitations
- Zero native web browser support, requiring specialized libraries, API conversions, or WebAssembly (like OpenJPH.js) for web deployment
- Lack of broad consumer awareness, keeping it confined to professional, medical, and scientific workflows
- Requires more advanced software ecosystems to decode than ubiquitous formats like JPEG or WebP
PJPEG
PJPEG Strengths
- Progressive JPEGs (which this MIME type attempted to describe) provide excellent perceived loading speeds on slow connections by rendering a low-resolution preview first
- Files sent with this MIME type are fully backwards compatible with any standard JPEG decoder
Limitations
- It is a non-standard MIME type that violates IANA specifications
- Causes strict file upload validation scripts to fail if not explicitly whitelisted or mapped
- Creates unnecessary confusion, as the official image/jpeg MIME type already fully encompasses progressive encoding
When to choose which format
HTJ2K-(JPH)
Use HTJ2K-(JPH) when…
- Medical Imaging (DICOM)
- Geospatial Data
- Digital Cinema
- Professional Archiving
PJPEG
Use PJPEG when…
- Legacy Internet Explorer File Uploads
- Progressive Image Rendering (Historical context)