Image MIME Reference
HTJ2K-(JPH)
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image
image/jph
VS
JPEG 2000 Codestream
image/j2c
J2C
A complete technical comparison of High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image and JPEG 2000 Codestream — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | HTJ2K-(JPH) | J2C |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | Yes |
| HDR Support | Yes | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image
image/jph
Extension
.jph
Container
JPH (ISO/IEC 15444-15)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2019
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 68 20
JPEG 2000 Codestream
image/j2c
Extension
.j2c.j2k.jpc
Container
None (Raw Bitstream)
Compression
JPEG 2000 (Discrete Wavelet Transform) / Lossless / Lossy
Algorithm
Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)
Color Depth
8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2000
Magic Bytes
FF 4F FF 51
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | HTJ2K-(JPH) | J2C |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
HTJ2K-(JPH)
HTJ2K-(JPH) Strengths
- Delivers orders of magnitude faster encoding and decoding than standard JPEG 2000 by utilizing a new, parallelizable block coder
- Supports mathematically lossless and lossy compression within the same codestream architecture
- Allows for resolution scalability, progressive decoding, and region-of-interest extraction without needing to decode the entire image
Limitations
- Zero native web browser support, requiring specialized libraries, API conversions, or WebAssembly (like OpenJPH.js) for web deployment
- Lack of broad consumer awareness, keeping it confined to professional, medical, and scientific workflows
- Requires more advanced software ecosystems to decode than ubiquitous formats like JPEG or WebP
J2C
J2C Strengths
- Provides state-of-the-art wavelet compression for high-end professional workflows (Digital Cinema)
- Allows for highly efficient progressive decoding (by resolution or quality layer) natively within the stream
- Supports lossless mathematical compression and high bit-depths (up to 16-bit per channel) natively
Limitations
- Lacks a standard container to store color space info or metadata, requiring external systems (like MXF or DICOM) to map colors correctly
- Extremely computationally expensive to encode and decode compared to standard DCT-based JPEG
- Zero web browser support
When to choose which format
HTJ2K-(JPH)
Use HTJ2K-(JPH) when…
- Medical Imaging (DICOM)
- Geospatial Data
- Digital Cinema
- Professional Archiving
J2C
Use J2C when…
- Digital Cinema Packages (DCP)
- Medical Imaging (DICOM Payloads)
- Professional Broadcast and Archiving
- Embedded Hardware Encoding