Image MIME Reference
HTJ2K-(JPH)
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image
image/jph
VS
X Window Dump (Legacy MIME Alias)
image/x-xwindowdump
XWD
A complete technical comparison of High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image and X Window Dump (Legacy MIME Alias) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | HTJ2K-(JPH) | XWD |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image
image/jph
Extension
.jph
Container
JPH (ISO/IEC 15444-15)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2019
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 68 20
X Window Dump (Legacy MIME Alias)
image/x-xwindowdump
Extension
.xwd.wd
Container
XWDHeader / XWDFileHeader Structure
Compression
Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
8-bit (Indexed), 16-bit (High Color), 24-bit (True Color), 32-bit (True Color with Alpha/Padding)
Developed by
MIT / X Consortium (X Window System)
Released
1987
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 64 (Typically indicates a 100-byte header size followed by version)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | HTJ2K-(JPH) | XWD |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
HTJ2K-(JPH)
HTJ2K-(JPH) Strengths
- Delivers orders of magnitude faster encoding and decoding than standard JPEG 2000 by utilizing a new, parallelizable block coder
- Supports mathematically lossless and lossy compression within the same codestream architecture
- Allows for resolution scalability, progressive decoding, and region-of-interest extraction without needing to decode the entire image
Limitations
- Zero native web browser support, requiring specialized libraries, API conversions, or WebAssembly (like OpenJPH.js) for web deployment
- Lack of broad consumer awareness, keeping it confined to professional, medical, and scientific workflows
- Requires more advanced software ecosystems to decode than ubiquitous formats like JPEG or WebP
XWD
XWD Strengths
- Provides an exact, raw pixel dump directly from the X11 display server memory without compression overhead
- Extremely fast for Unix environments to generate during low-level graphical debugging
Limitations
- Completely uncompressed, resulting in large, bloated file sizes
- Zero support in web browsers or modern desktop environments without specialized graphics translation tools
- Verbose legacy MIME strings like 'image/x-xwindowdump' require backend normalization in modern applications
When to choose which format
HTJ2K-(JPH)
Use HTJ2K-(JPH) when…
- Medical Imaging (DICOM)
- Geospatial Data
- Digital Cinema
- Professional Archiving
XWD
Use XWD when…
- X Window System (X11) Display Debugging and Screenshots
- Legacy Unix/Linux System Administration