Image MIME Reference
HTJ2K-(JPH)
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image
image/jph
VS
Wireless Bitmap
image/vnd.wap.wbmp
WBMP
A complete technical comparison of High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image and Wireless Bitmap — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | HTJ2K-(JPH) | WBMP |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image
image/jph
Extension
.jph
Container
JPH (ISO/IEC 15444-15)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2019
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 68 20
Wireless Bitmap
image/vnd.wap.wbmp
Extension
.wbmp
Container
WBMP Type 0
Compression
Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome)
Developed by
WAP Forum (Now Open Mobile Alliance)
Released
1999
Magic Bytes
00 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | HTJ2K-(JPH) | WBMP |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
HTJ2K-(JPH)
HTJ2K-(JPH) Strengths
- Delivers orders of magnitude faster encoding and decoding than standard JPEG 2000 by utilizing a new, parallelizable block coder
- Supports mathematically lossless and lossy compression within the same codestream architecture
- Allows for resolution scalability, progressive decoding, and region-of-interest extraction without needing to decode the entire image
Limitations
- Zero native web browser support, requiring specialized libraries, API conversions, or WebAssembly (like OpenJPH.js) for web deployment
- Lack of broad consumer awareness, keeping it confined to professional, medical, and scientific workflows
- Requires more advanced software ecosystems to decode than ubiquitous formats like JPEG or WebP
WBMP
WBMP Strengths
- Extremely low processing overhead made it perfectly suited for the ultra-low-power CPUs of late 1990s mobile devices
- Tightly integrated into the WML (Wireless Markup Language) stack, enabling the first functional mobile internet experiences
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and lacks support in modern operating systems and browsers
- Limited entirely to 1-bit black and white (0 for black, 1 for white) with zero support for grayscale, color, or transparency
- The lack of a strong file header signature makes automated MIME type detection highly unreliable
When to choose which format
HTJ2K-(JPH)
Use HTJ2K-(JPH) when…
- Medical Imaging (DICOM)
- Geospatial Data
- Digital Cinema
- Professional Archiving
WBMP
Use WBMP when…
- Legacy WML (Wireless Markup Language) Mobile Sites
- Early Mobile Phone Icons and Operator Logos
- Historical WAP Archival