Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
HTJ2K-(JPH)

High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image

image/jph
VS

SealedMedia Portable Network Graphics

image/vnd.sealed.png
Sealed-PNG

A complete technical comparison of High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image and SealedMedia Portable Network Graphics — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature HTJ2K-(JPH) Sealed-PNG
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image
image/jph
Extension
.jph
Container JPH (ISO/IEC 15444-15)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2019
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 68 20
Full HTJ2K-(JPH) reference →
SealedMedia Portable Network Graphics
image/vnd.sealed.png
Extension
.spng.sealed-png
Container SealedMedia / Oracle IRM Wrapper
Compression Encrypted Payload (Deflate)
Algorithm
AES EncryptionDeflate (Internal PNG payload)
Color Depth Encrypted Payload
Developed by SealedMedia (Acquired by Oracle Corporation)
Released Late 1990s / Early 2000s
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary SealedMedia Container)
Full Sealed-PNG reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser HTJ2K-(JPH) Sealed-PNG
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
HTJ2K-(JPH)

HTJ2K-(JPH) Strengths

  • Delivers orders of magnitude faster encoding and decoding than standard JPEG 2000 by utilizing a new, parallelizable block coder
  • Supports mathematically lossless and lossy compression within the same codestream architecture
  • Allows for resolution scalability, progressive decoding, and region-of-interest extraction without needing to decode the entire image
Limitations
  • Zero native web browser support, requiring specialized libraries, API conversions, or WebAssembly (like OpenJPH.js) for web deployment
  • Lack of broad consumer awareness, keeping it confined to professional, medical, and scientific workflows
  • Requires more advanced software ecosystems to decode than ubiquitous formats like JPEG or WebP
Sealed-PNG

Sealed-PNG Strengths

  • Provided absolute control over intellectual property, allowing enterprise administrators to instantly revoke viewing rights of a local file globally
  • Detailed audit trails tracked exactly who opened the image, when, and from what IP address
Limitations
  • Completely proprietary and relies on a central authentication server; if the server goes offline, the image is permanently inaccessible
  • No support in modern operating systems, web browsers, or standard image editing software without installing heavy enterprise DRM clients
  • Oracle effectively deprecated the IRM product line, leaving legacy sealed documents difficult to recover

When to choose which format

HTJ2K-(JPH)
Use HTJ2K-(JPH) when…
  • Medical Imaging (DICOM)
  • Geospatial Data
  • Digital Cinema
  • Professional Archiving
Sealed-PNG
Use Sealed-PNG when…
  • Enterprise Information Rights Management (IRM)
  • Secure Corporate Intellectual Property Distribution
  • Revocable Medical or Legal Imaging

More comparisons

HTJ2K-(JPH) vs ACES → Sealed-PNG vs ACES → HTJ2K-(JPH) vs APNG → Sealed-PNG vs APNG → HTJ2K-(JPH) vs AVCI → Sealed-PNG vs AVCI → HTJ2K-(JPH) vs AVCS → Sealed-PNG vs AVCS → HTJ2K-(JPH) vs AVIF → Sealed-PNG vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison