Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
HSJ2

JPEG 2000 Image Sequence (Obsolete)

image/hsj2
VS

North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax

image/naplps
NAPLPS

A complete technical comparison of JPEG 2000 Image Sequence (Obsolete) and North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature HSJ2 NAPLPS
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support Yes Yes
Progressive Loading Yes Yes
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
JPEG 2000 Image Sequence (Obsolete)
image/hsj2
Extension
.hsj2
Container HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 15444-16 Obsolete)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Motion JPEG 2000 (ISO/IEC 15444-3)
Color Depth 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit
Developed by ISO/IEC JTC 1 / ITU-T
Released 2019
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 68 73 6A 32
Full HSJ2 reference →
North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax
image/naplps
Extension
.nap.naplps
Container NAPLPS Byte Stream
Compression Uncompressed (Tokenized ASCII Commands)
Algorithm
None (Coordinate encoding)
Color Depth 16-color palette (Indexed from larger color spaces)
Developed by ANSI / CSA (Based on Canadian CRC's Telidon)
Released 1983
Magic Bytes
1B (Variable / ESC sequences)
Full NAPLPS reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser HSJ2 NAPLPS
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
HSJ2

HSJ2 Strengths

  • Historically attempted to combine Motion JPEG 2000 sequences with the flexible metadata capabilities of the HEIF container
  • Supported mathematically lossless compression and scalable wavelet decoding
Limitations
  • Officially deprecated by the standardization body (ISO/IEC JTC 1)
  • Completely superseded by image/hej2k, rendering hsj2 files obsolete for any new development or archiving
  • Zero web browser compatibility and negligible modern software support
NAPLPS

NAPLPS Strengths

  • Extremely bandwidth-efficient, enabling colorful graphical interfaces over early 300 baud dial-up connections
  • Resolution-independent vector scaling allowed the exact same file to be displayed accurately on varied early PC monitors and television sets
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported by modern web technologies
  • Relies heavily on stateful parsing and terminal emulators rather than straightforward file decoding
  • Easily misidentified by MIME sniffers as plain text or generic binary streams due to the lack of a standardized file header

When to choose which format

HSJ2
Use HSJ2 when…
  • Legacy Archival
  • Deprecated Workflows
NAPLPS
Use NAPLPS when…
  • 1980s Videotex Services
  • Prodigy Online Service Graphics
  • Historical BBS Terminal Graphics
  • Legacy Teletext Broadcasts
Share this comparison