Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
HSJ2

JPEG 2000 Image Sequence (Obsolete)

image/hsj2
VS

JPEG 2000 Core Image File

image/jp2
JPEG-2000

A complete technical comparison of JPEG 2000 Image Sequence (Obsolete) and JPEG 2000 Core Image File — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

JPEG-2000 wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature HSJ2 JPEG-2000
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes Yes
HDR Support Yes Yes
EXIF Metadata Yes Yes
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
JPEG 2000 Image Sequence (Obsolete)
image/hsj2
Extension
.hsj2
Container HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 15444-16 Obsolete)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Motion JPEG 2000 (ISO/IEC 15444-3)
Color Depth 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit
Developed by ISO/IEC JTC 1 / ITU-T
Released 2019
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 68 73 6A 32
Full HSJ2 reference →
JPEG 2000 Core Image File
image/jp2
Extension
.jp2.j2k.jpf.jpx.jpm
Container JP2 (ISO/IEC 15444-1)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group
Released 2000
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A
Full JPEG-2000 reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser HSJ2 JPEG-2000
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
✓ 5+
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
HSJ2

HSJ2 Strengths

  • Historically attempted to combine Motion JPEG 2000 sequences with the flexible metadata capabilities of the HEIF container
  • Supported mathematically lossless compression and scalable wavelet decoding
Limitations
  • Officially deprecated by the standardization body (ISO/IEC JTC 1)
  • Completely superseded by image/hej2k, rendering hsj2 files obsolete for any new development or archiving
  • Zero web browser compatibility and negligible modern software support
JPEG-2000

JPEG-2000 Strengths

  • Superior compression efficiency over baseline JPEG without introducing blocking artifacts
  • True mathematically lossless compression available in the same format
  • Extremely scalable: a single file can be decoded at various resolutions (thumbnails to full size) without loading the entire file
Limitations
  • Very poor native web browser support prevents it from being a web standard
  • High computational complexity makes encoding and decoding significantly slower than JPEG
  • Early patent concerns and complex licensing hindered its initial adoption rate

When to choose which format

HSJ2
Use HSJ2 when…
  • Legacy Archival
  • Deprecated Workflows
JPEG-2000
Use JPEG-2000 when…
  • Digital Cinema (DCP)
  • Medical Imaging (DICOM)
  • Geospatial Data
  • Archival Preservation
Share this comparison