Image MIME Reference
HSJ2
JPEG 2000 Image Sequence (Obsolete)
image/hsj2
VS
JPEG 2000 Core Image File
image/jp2
JPEG-2000
A complete technical comparison of JPEG 2000 Image Sequence (Obsolete) and JPEG 2000 Core Image File — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
JPEG-2000 wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | HSJ2 | JPEG-2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | Yes |
| Animation Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | Yes |
| HDR Support | Yes | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | Yes |
JPEG 2000 Image Sequence (Obsolete)
image/hsj2
Extension
.hsj2
Container
HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 15444-16 Obsolete)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Motion JPEG 2000 (ISO/IEC 15444-3)
Color Depth
8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit
Developed by
ISO/IEC JTC 1 / ITU-T
Released
2019
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 68 73 6A 32
JPEG 2000 Core Image File
image/jp2
Extension
.jp2.j2k.jpf.jpx.jpm
Container
JP2 (ISO/IEC 15444-1)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group
Released
2000
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | HSJ2 | JPEG-2000 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ |
✓ 5+
|
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
HSJ2
HSJ2 Strengths
- Historically attempted to combine Motion JPEG 2000 sequences with the flexible metadata capabilities of the HEIF container
- Supported mathematically lossless compression and scalable wavelet decoding
Limitations
- Officially deprecated by the standardization body (ISO/IEC JTC 1)
- Completely superseded by image/hej2k, rendering hsj2 files obsolete for any new development or archiving
- Zero web browser compatibility and negligible modern software support
JPEG-2000
JPEG-2000 Strengths
- Superior compression efficiency over baseline JPEG without introducing blocking artifacts
- True mathematically lossless compression available in the same format
- Extremely scalable: a single file can be decoded at various resolutions (thumbnails to full size) without loading the entire file
Limitations
- Very poor native web browser support prevents it from being a web standard
- High computational complexity makes encoding and decoding significantly slower than JPEG
- Early patent concerns and complex licensing hindered its initial adoption rate
When to choose which format
HSJ2
Use HSJ2 when…
- Legacy Archival
- Deprecated Workflows
JPEG-2000
Use JPEG-2000 when…
- Digital Cinema (DCP)
- Medical Imaging (DICOM)
- Geospatial Data
- Archival Preservation