Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
HEJ2K

JPEG 2000 Image (HEIF Container)

image/hej2k
VS

Kodak K25 Raw Image

image/x-kodak-k25
Kodak-K25

A complete technical comparison of JPEG 2000 Image (HEIF Container) and Kodak K25 Raw Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature HEJ2K Kodak-K25
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support Yes Yes
EXIF Metadata Yes Yes
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
JPEG 2000 Image (HEIF Container)
image/hej2k
Extension
.hej2
Container HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 15444-16)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
JPEG 2000HTJ2K
Color Depth 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit
Developed by ISO/IEC JTC 1 / ITU-T
Released 2019
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 6A 32 6B 69
Full HEJ2K reference →
Kodak K25 Raw Image
image/x-kodak-k25
Extension
.k25
Container Proprietary Kodak Raw (TIFF-based variant)
Compression Uncompressed / Proprietary Lossless
Algorithm
Proprietary Kodak Compression
Color Depth 10-bit, 12-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Eastman Kodak Company
Released 1996
Magic Bytes
Varies (Often resembles TIFF header 49 49 2A 00 or requires proprietary parsing)
Full Kodak-K25 reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser HEJ2K Kodak-K25
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
HEJ2K

HEJ2K Strengths

  • Brings the extensive capabilities of the HEIF container (like EXIF/XMP, thumbnails, and depth maps) to JPEG 2000
  • Supports mathematically lossless compression via wavelet transformation
  • High scalability and progressive decoding out of the box
Limitations
  • Extremely limited software support outside of niche industries
  • Zero native compatibility with web browsers
  • High computational complexity compared to simpler formats like JPEG or PNG
Kodak-K25

Kodak-K25 Strengths

  • Historically significant format tied to the first digital camera to adopt CompactFlash memory
  • Preserves original raw sensor data, allowing modern demosaicing algorithms (via LibRaw) to extract much better image quality than 1996-era software could
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and deeply proprietary, lacking modern raw format features found in DNG
  • Cannot be natively viewed in web browsers or standard operating system image viewers without specialized decoders
  • Subject to misidentification by automated MIME detection libraries due to structural similarities with standard TIFFs

When to choose which format

HEJ2K
Use HEJ2K when…
  • Medical Imaging
  • Geospatial Data
  • Scientific Archiving
Kodak-K25
Use Kodak-K25 when…
  • Vintage Digital Photography Archival
  • Kodak DC25 Camera Restorations
  • Historical Imaging Research
Share this comparison