Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
HEJ2K

JPEG 2000 Image (HEIF Container)

image/hej2k
VS

Windows Icon (Legacy MIME)

image/x-icon
ICO

A complete technical comparison of JPEG 2000 Image (HEIF Container) and Windows Icon (Legacy MIME) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

ICO wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature HEJ2K ICO
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
JPEG 2000 Image (HEIF Container)
image/hej2k
Extension
.hej2
Container HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 15444-16)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
JPEG 2000HTJ2K
Color Depth 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit
Developed by ISO/IEC JTC 1 / ITU-T
Released 2019
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 6A 32 6B 69
Full HEJ2K reference →
Windows Icon (Legacy MIME)
image/x-icon
Extension
.ico
Container ICO Directory Structure
Compression Uncompressed (DIB/BMP) / Deflate (Embedded PNG)
Algorithm
NoneDeflate (via PNG)
Color Depth 1-bit, 4-bit, 8-bit, 24-bit (True Color), 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by Microsoft Corporation
Released 1985
Magic Bytes
00 00 01 00
Full ICO reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser HEJ2K ICO
Chrome Chrome
✕
✓ 1
Firefox Firefox
✕
✓ 1
Safari Safari
✕
✓ 1
Edge Edge
✕
✓ 12
IE IE (Legacy)
✕
✓
HEJ2K

HEJ2K Strengths

  • Brings the extensive capabilities of the HEIF container (like EXIF/XMP, thumbnails, and depth maps) to JPEG 2000
  • Supports mathematically lossless compression via wavelet transformation
  • High scalability and progressive decoding out of the box
Limitations
  • Extremely limited software support outside of niche industries
  • Zero native compatibility with web browsers
  • High computational complexity compared to simpler formats like JPEG or PNG
ICO

ICO Strengths

  • Universally supported by every web browser in existence for website favicons
  • Packs multiple resolutions into a single file, eliminating the need to serve different files for the taskbar vs. the desktop
  • Modern support for embedded PNGs (since Windows Vista) allows for excellent 32-bit transparency (alpha channels) and drastically reduced file sizes
Limitations
  • Internal file structure is convoluted due to decades of legacy cruft, such as the requirement for BMP data to lack a standard file header but double the height property for an archaic XOR/AND mask
  • Larger file size compared to a single optimized PNG or SVG, as it literally stores the same image multiple times at different scales
  • The MIME type landscape is highly fragmented (x-icon vs. vnd.microsoft.icon), causing occasional caching or strict-MIME validation errors on restrictive servers

When to choose which format

HEJ2K
Use HEJ2K when…
  • Medical Imaging
  • Geospatial Data
  • Scientific Archiving
ICO
Use ICO when…
  • Website Favicons (favicon.ico)
  • Windows Application Executable Icons (.exe)
  • Desktop Shortcut Icons

More comparisons

HEJ2K vs ACES → ICO vs ACES → HEJ2K vs APNG → ICO vs APNG → HEJ2K vs AVCI → ICO vs AVCI → HEJ2K vs AVCS → ICO vs AVCS → HEJ2K vs AVIF → ICO vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison