Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
HEIF-Sequence

High Efficiency Image File Format Sequence

image/heif-sequence
VS

PWG Raster Format

image/pwg-raster
PWG-Raster

A complete technical comparison of High Efficiency Image File Format Sequence and PWG Raster Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature HEIF-Sequence PWG-Raster
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
High Efficiency Image File Format Sequence
image/heif-sequence
Extension
.heifs.heif.hif
Container HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 14496-12)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Codec Agnostic (HEVC, AVC, JPEG, AV1)
Color Depth 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit
Developed by Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG)
Released 2015
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 6D 73 66 31
Full HEIF-Sequence reference →
PWG Raster Format
image/pwg-raster
Extension
.pwg.ras
Container CUPS Raster v2 Container
Compression PackBits (Run-Length Encoding)
Algorithm
PackBits (Apple RLE variant)
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome/K), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (sRGB / Adobe RGB), 32-bit (CMYK)
Developed by IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group (PWG)
Released 2011
Magic Bytes
52 61 53 32
Full PWG-Raster reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser HEIF-Sequence PWG-Raster
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
HEIF-Sequence

HEIF-Sequence Strengths

  • Codec-agnostic container allows for extreme flexibility when storing multi-frame photographic data
  • Maintains the space-saving benefits of ISOBMFF shared frame data blocks
  • Excellent for archiving computational photography workloads like exposure brackets or focal stacks
Limitations
  • Codec ambiguity means a decoder might be able to parse the container but fail to decode the underlying pixels
  • Zero native web browser support
  • Complex container structure requires specialized parsing libraries to extract individual frames
PWG-Raster

PWG-Raster Strengths

  • The undisputed global standard for modern, driverless printing environments, eliminating the nightmare of installing manufacturer-specific print drivers
  • Extremely lightweight to decode on embedded hardware, requiring minimal RAM buffers on the printer side
  • Strict color space and resolution rules guarantee that the printed output will successfully process without syntax errors
Limitations
  • Generates massive file sizes and network payloads compared to vector-based formats like PDF or PostScript, as every page is fully rasterized at 300+ DPI before transmission
  • No support for native rendering in web browsers, image viewers, or graphic design software without specialized CUPS developer tools
  • Cannot store complex metadata, vector text, or layers

When to choose which format

HEIF-Sequence
Use HEIF-Sequence when…
  • Burst Photography
  • Focal Stacking
  • Exposure Bracketing
  • Time-Lapse Data
PWG-Raster
Use PWG-Raster when…
  • Driverless Network Printing (IPP Everywhere)
  • Apple AirPrint and Mopria Print Service Pipelines
  • CUPS (Common UNIX Printing System) Spooling

More comparisons

HEIF-Sequence vs ACES → PWG-Raster vs ACES → HEIF-Sequence vs APNG → PWG-Raster vs APNG → HEIF-Sequence vs AVCI → PWG-Raster vs AVCI → HEIF-Sequence vs AVCS → PWG-Raster vs AVCS → HEIF-Sequence vs AVIF → PWG-Raster vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison