Image MIME Reference
HEIF-Sequence
High Efficiency Image File Format Sequence
image/heif-sequence
VS
North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax
image/naplps
NAPLPS
A complete technical comparison of High Efficiency Image File Format Sequence and North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | HEIF-Sequence | NAPLPS |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | Yes | Yes |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
High Efficiency Image File Format Sequence
image/heif-sequence
Extension
.heifs.heif.hif
Container
HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 14496-12)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Codec Agnostic (HEVC, AVC, JPEG, AV1)
Color Depth
8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit
Developed by
Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG)
Released
2015
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 6D 73 66 31
North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax
image/naplps
Extension
.nap.naplps
Container
NAPLPS Byte Stream
Compression
Uncompressed (Tokenized ASCII Commands)
Algorithm
None (Coordinate encoding)
Color Depth
16-color palette (Indexed from larger color spaces)
Developed by
ANSI / CSA (Based on Canadian CRC's Telidon)
Released
1983
Magic Bytes
1B (Variable / ESC sequences)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | HEIF-Sequence | NAPLPS |
|---|---|---|
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
HEIF-Sequence
HEIF-Sequence Strengths
- Codec-agnostic container allows for extreme flexibility when storing multi-frame photographic data
- Maintains the space-saving benefits of ISOBMFF shared frame data blocks
- Excellent for archiving computational photography workloads like exposure brackets or focal stacks
Limitations
- Codec ambiguity means a decoder might be able to parse the container but fail to decode the underlying pixels
- Zero native web browser support
- Complex container structure requires specialized parsing libraries to extract individual frames
NAPLPS
NAPLPS Strengths
- Extremely bandwidth-efficient, enabling colorful graphical interfaces over early 300 baud dial-up connections
- Resolution-independent vector scaling allowed the exact same file to be displayed accurately on varied early PC monitors and television sets
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported by modern web technologies
- Relies heavily on stateful parsing and terminal emulators rather than straightforward file decoding
- Easily misidentified by MIME sniffers as plain text or generic binary streams due to the lack of a standardized file header
When to choose which format
HEIF-Sequence
Use HEIF-Sequence when…
- Burst Photography
- Focal Stacking
- Exposure Bracketing
- Time-Lapse Data
NAPLPS
Use NAPLPS when…
- 1980s Videotex Services
- Prodigy Online Service Graphics
- Historical BBS Terminal Graphics
- Legacy Teletext Broadcasts