Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
HEIC

High Efficiency Image Container

image/heic
VS

Sony SRF Raw Image

image/x-sony-srf
Sony-SRF

A complete technical comparison of High Efficiency Image Container and Sony SRF Raw Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

HEIC wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature HEIC Sony-SRF
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes Yes
EXIF Metadata Yes Yes
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
High Efficiency Image Container
image/heic
Extension
.heic
Container HEIF / ISOBMFF
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
HEVC (H.265)
Color Depth 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit
Developed by MPEG (Standard) / Apple (Adoption)
Released 2017
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 68 65 69 63
Full HEIC reference →
Sony SRF Raw Image
image/x-sony-srf
Extension
.srf
Container TIFF-based (Proprietary)
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 12-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Sony Corporation
Released 2003
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Full Sony-SRF reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser HEIC Sony-SRF
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
✓ 11+
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
HEIC

HEIC Strengths

  • Exceptional compression efficiency — stores images at roughly half the file size of JPEG with equal or better visual quality
  • Natively supports modern photography features like depth maps, 16-bit color, HDR, and alpha channel transparency
  • Can store image bursts, focal stacks, and animations (Live Photos) within a single file
Limitations
  • Heavily encumbered by software patents, leading to very poor adoption outside the Apple ecosystem
  • Not supported by standard web browsers (except Safari), requiring server-side or client-side conversion for web delivery
  • Windows requires downloading a separate (often paid) extension from the Microsoft Store to view natively
Sony-SRF

Sony-SRF Strengths

  • Retains perfectly raw, unprocessed sensor data from legacy early-2000s cameras, allowing modern raw processors to extract much better dynamic range and color than the camera's original internal JPEG engine could
  • Utilizes a standard TIFF container structure, ensuring broad compatibility with community-maintained open-source decoding libraries like LibRaw
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete format that has long been abandoned in favor of ARW
  • MIME detection via magic bytes is unreliable due to TIFF header spoofing, requiring deeper EXIF inspection for accurate routing
  • Cannot be natively viewed in web browsers or standard operating system image viewers without specialized decoders

When to choose which format

HEIC
Use HEIC when…
  • iOS / iPhone Photography
  • macOS Ecosystem
  • High-Quality Image Archiving
Sony-SRF
Use Sony-SRF when…
  • Legacy Sony Cyber-shot Photography
  • Non-destructive Image Post-Processing
  • Early 2000s Raw Imaging Archival
Share this comparison