Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
HEIC

High Efficiency Image Container

image/heic
VS

High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream

image/jphc
HTJ2K-Codestream

A complete technical comparison of High Efficiency Image Container and High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

HEIC wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature HEIC HTJ2K-Codestream
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support Yes Yes
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
High Efficiency Image Container
image/heic
Extension
.heic
Container HEIF / ISOBMFF
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
HEVC (H.265)
Color Depth 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit
Developed by MPEG (Standard) / Apple (Adoption)
Released 2017
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 68 65 69 63
Full HEIC reference →
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream
image/jphc
Extension
.jhc
Container None (Raw Codestream)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2019
Magic Bytes
FF 4F FF 51
Full HTJ2K-Codestream reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser HEIC HTJ2K-Codestream
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
✓ 11+
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
HEIC

HEIC Strengths

  • Exceptional compression efficiency — stores images at roughly half the file size of JPEG with equal or better visual quality
  • Natively supports modern photography features like depth maps, 16-bit color, HDR, and alpha channel transparency
  • Can store image bursts, focal stacks, and animations (Live Photos) within a single file
Limitations
  • Heavily encumbered by software patents, leading to very poor adoption outside the Apple ecosystem
  • Not supported by standard web browsers (except Safari), requiring server-side or client-side conversion for web delivery
  • Windows requires downloading a separate (often paid) extension from the Microsoft Store to view natively
HTJ2K-Codestream

HTJ2K-Codestream Strengths

  • Extremely fast encoding and decoding capabilities due to the parallelizable block coder
  • Minimal file overhead since it lacks container headers and metadata
  • Ideal for streaming applications or embedded systems where parsing a full container is unnecessary
Limitations
  • Lacks standard metadata support (like EXIF, XMP, or ICC color profiles) since there is no container structure
  • Zero native web browser compatibility
  • Difficult to distinguish from standard JPEG 2000 codestreams without deeply parsing the internal marker segments

When to choose which format

HEIC
Use HEIC when…
  • iOS / iPhone Photography
  • macOS Ecosystem
  • High-Quality Image Archiving
HTJ2K-Codestream
Use HTJ2K-Codestream when…
  • Medical Imaging Pipelines
  • Geospatial Data Streaming
  • Digital Cinema
  • Embedded Systems
Share this comparison