Image MIME Reference
Harlequin-PGB
Global Graphics Page Graphics Buffer
image/vnd.globalgraphics.pgb
VS
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
MODI
A complete technical comparison of Global Graphics Page Graphics Buffer and Microsoft Document Imaging — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | Harlequin-PGB | MODI |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
Global Graphics Page Graphics Buffer
image/vnd.globalgraphics.pgb
Extension
.pgb
Container
Proprietary Harlequin Raster Container
Compression
Uncompressed / Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Algorithm
Proprietary RLENone
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome Separations), 8-bit (Grayscale), 8-bit/10-bit (Contone), CMYK / N-Color Spot Channels
Developed by
Global Graphics Software (Hybrid Software Group)
Released
1990s
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary Harlequin Header)
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container
TIFF Variant
Compression
LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | Harlequin-PGB | MODI |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
Harlequin-PGB
Harlequin-PGB Strengths
- Unlike generic 1-bit TIFFs, PGB files inherently encapsulate vital print-job metadata within their headers (e.g., job name, page number, separation colors, screening angles)
- Highly optimized for ultra-fast viewing and processing within professional printing workflows
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and closed-source, locking its usage strictly to Harlequin-powered RIP environments
- Zero support in standard desktop operating systems, web browsers, or consumer image editing software like Photoshop or GIMP
MODI
MODI Strengths
- Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
- Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
- Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
- Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities
When to choose which format
Harlequin-PGB
Use Harlequin-PGB when…
- Commercial Printing Output
- Computer-to-Plate (CTP) Manufacturing
- Prepress Soft Proofing (e.g., FirstPROOF)
- Harlequin RIP Spooling Pipelines
MODI
Use MODI when…
- Legacy Scanned Document Archival
- Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
- Embedded OCR Text Storage