Image MIME Reference
Harlequin-PGB
Global Graphics Page Graphics Buffer
image/vnd.globalgraphics.pgb
VS
JPEG-LS
image/jls
JPEG-LS
A complete technical comparison of Global Graphics Page Graphics Buffer and JPEG-LS — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | Harlequin-PGB | JPEG-LS |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
Global Graphics Page Graphics Buffer
image/vnd.globalgraphics.pgb
Extension
.pgb
Container
Proprietary Harlequin Raster Container
Compression
Uncompressed / Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Algorithm
Proprietary RLENone
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome Separations), 8-bit (Grayscale), 8-bit/10-bit (Contone), CMYK / N-Color Spot Channels
Developed by
Global Graphics Software (Hybrid Software Group)
Released
1990s
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary Harlequin Header)
JPEG-LS
image/jls
Extension
.jls.jl
Container
JPEG Bitstream
Compression
Lossless / Near-Lossless (Predictive Coding)
Algorithm
LOCO-I (Low Complexity Lossless Compression for Images)Golomb-Rice Coding
Color Depth
8-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (ISO/ITU-T) & HP Labs
Released
1999
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF F7
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | Harlequin-PGB | JPEG-LS |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
Harlequin-PGB
Harlequin-PGB Strengths
- Unlike generic 1-bit TIFFs, PGB files inherently encapsulate vital print-job metadata within their headers (e.g., job name, page number, separation colors, screening angles)
- Highly optimized for ultra-fast viewing and processing within professional printing workflows
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and closed-source, locking its usage strictly to Harlequin-powered RIP environments
- Zero support in standard desktop operating systems, web browsers, or consumer image editing software like Photoshop or GIMP
JPEG-LS
JPEG-LS Strengths
- Provides state-of-the-art lossless compression ratios for continuous-tone images, often outperforming Lossless JPEG and JPEG 2000
- Extremely fast and computationally inexpensive to encode/decode, requiring no complex floating-point math or DCTs
- Highly resilient in constrained hardware environments, making it ideal for medical equipment and deep-space probes (e.g., Mars rovers)
Limitations
- Zero native support in web browsers or standard consumer operating systems
- Lacks the advanced resolution scalability and progressive decoding features found in JPEG 2000
- Primarily relegated to niche enterprise sectors (healthcare/DICOM and aerospace) rather than consumer adoption
When to choose which format
Harlequin-PGB
Use Harlequin-PGB when…
- Commercial Printing Output
- Computer-to-Plate (CTP) Manufacturing
- Prepress Soft Proofing (e.g., FirstPROOF)
- Harlequin RIP Spooling Pipelines
JPEG-LS
Use JPEG-LS when…
- Medical Imaging (DICOM Encapsulation)
- Space and Planetary Imaging (NASA/ESA)
- Industrial Machine Vision
- Scientific Archival Storage