Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
GIF

Graphics Interchange Format

image/gif
VS

X Pixmap

image/x-xpixmap
XPM

A complete technical comparison of Graphics Interchange Format and X Pixmap — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

GIF wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature GIF XPM
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
Graphics Interchange Format
image/gif
Extension
.gif
Container GIF
Compression Lossless (LZW)
Algorithm
LZW (Lempel-Ziv-Welch)
Color Depth 1-bit, 4-bit, 8-bit (Indexed)
Developed by CompuServe
Released 1987
Magic Bytes
47 49 46 38 39 61
Full GIF reference →
X Pixmap
image/x-xpixmap
Extension
.xpm
Container C Source Code Header (.c / .h)
Compression Uncompressed (Source Code)
Algorithm
None
Color Depth Indexed Color (Custom Palette with RGB and Alpha 'None')
Developed by Daniel Dardailler and Colas Nahaboo (Bull / X Consortium)
Released 1989
Magic Bytes
2F 2A 20 58 50 4D 20 2A 2F (ASCII '/* XPM */')
Full XPM reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser GIF XPM
Chrome Chrome
✓ All
 ✕
Firefox Firefox
✓ All
 ✕
Safari Safari
✓ All
 ✕
Edge Edge
✓ All
 ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✓
✓
GIF

GIF Strengths

  • Universal support across all web browsers, operating systems, and messaging apps
  • Supports basic frame-by-frame animation out of the box
  • Lossless compression is highly effective for simple, flat-color graphics like logos or pixel art
Limitations
  • Limited to 256 colors per frame, resulting in poor quality for complex gradients and photographs
  • Animations produce massive file sizes compared to modern formats like MP4, WebP, or AVIF
  • 1-bit transparency limits edge blending on non-uniform backgrounds
XPM

XPM Strengths

  • Can be compiled directly into C or C++ source code without requiring an external asset loading mechanism
  • Human-readable palette mapping allows developers to inspect, modify, or hand-craft icons directly within a text editor
  • Native support for color palettes and transparency via the 'None' keyword
Limitations
  • Extremely inefficient storage structure for large images, resulting in massive file bloat compared to binary formats like PNG
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern web browsers
  • Parsing overhead requires compiling or interpreting text-based color tables at runtime

When to choose which format

GIF
Use GIF when…
  • Web Animations
  • Memes
  • Simple Graphics
  • Logos with flat colors
XPM
Use XPM when…
  • X Window System (X11) Application Icons and Cursors
  • Embedded C/C++ Firmware Color UI Assets
  • Early Linux Desktop Environment Themes

More comparisons

GIF vs ACES → XPM vs ACES → GIF vs APNG → XPM vs APNG → GIF vs AVCI → XPM vs AVCI → GIF vs AVCS → XPM vs AVCS → GIF vs AVIF → XPM vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison