Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
GIF

Graphics Interchange Format

image/gif
VS

JPEG XL

image/jxl
JXL

A complete technical comparison of Graphics Interchange Format and JPEG XL — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

GIF wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature GIF JXL
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support Yes Yes
Progressive Loading Yes Yes
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
Graphics Interchange Format
image/gif
Extension
.gif
Container GIF
Compression Lossless (LZW)
Algorithm
LZW (Lempel-Ziv-Welch)
Color Depth 1-bit, 4-bit, 8-bit (Indexed)
Developed by CompuServe
Released 1987
Magic Bytes
47 49 46 38 39 61
Full GIF reference →
JPEG XL
image/jxl
Extension
.jxl
Container ISOBMFF / JPEG XL Codestream
Compression Lossy (VarDCT) / Lossless (Modular)
Algorithm
VarDCT (Variable block-size DCT)Modular (Predictive coding for lossless)
Color Depth 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit (Float)
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2021
Magic Bytes
FF 0A (Codestream) / 00 00 00 0C 4A 58 4C 20 0D 0A 87 0A (Container)
Full JXL reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser GIF JXL
Chrome Chrome
✓ All
 ✕
Firefox Firefox
✓ All
 ✕
Safari Safari
✓ All
✓ 17+
Edge Edge
✓ All
 ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✓
 ✕
GIF

GIF Strengths

  • Universal support across all web browsers, operating systems, and messaging apps
  • Supports basic frame-by-frame animation out of the box
  • Lossless compression is highly effective for simple, flat-color graphics like logos or pixel art
Limitations
  • Limited to 256 colors per frame, resulting in poor quality for complex gradients and photographs
  • Animations produce massive file sizes compared to modern formats like MP4, WebP, or AVIF
  • 1-bit transparency limits edge blending on non-uniform backgrounds
JXL

JXL Strengths

  • Capable of losslessly recompressing legacy JPEG files, saving ~20% space while retaining perfect byte-for-byte restorability
  • Highly superior progressive decoding (Saliency-driven), allowing recognizable images to load extremely fast on slow connections
  • Outperforms WebP and competes favorably with AVIF, especially at high-fidelity settings and for complex textures/photography
  • Royalty-free with an open-source reference implementation (libjxl)
Limitations
  • Google's removal of JXL support from Chrome severely hindered its adoption as a universal web standard
  • Lack of hardware decoding chips compared to video-derived codecs like AVIF (AV1)
  • File parsing logic is complex due to the split between raw codestreams and ISOBMFF containers

When to choose which format

GIF
Use GIF when…
  • Web Animations
  • Memes
  • Simple Graphics
  • Logos with flat colors
JXL
Use JXL when…
  • High-End Web Delivery (via Safari/Polyfills)
  • HDR Photography
  • Legacy JPEG Archiving
  • Digital Art & Image Storage

More comparisons

GIF vs ACES → JXL vs ACES → GIF vs APNG → JXL vs APNG → GIF vs AVCI → JXL vs AVCI → GIF vs AVCS → JXL vs AVCS → GIF vs AVIF → JXL vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison