Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
Generic-RAW

Digital Camera Raw (Generic Linux MIME)

image/x-dcraw
VS

RealNetworks RealPix

image/vnd.rn-realpix
RealPix

A complete technical comparison of Digital Camera Raw (Generic Linux MIME) and RealNetworks RealPix — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature Generic-RAW RealPix
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No Yes
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
Digital Camera Raw (Generic Linux MIME)
image/x-dcraw
Extension
.raw
Container Varies (Predominantly TIFF/EP)
Compression Lossless / Uncompressed
Algorithm
Varies (Often Lossless JPEG ITU-T81 or uncompressed)
Color Depth 12-bit, 14-bit, 16-bit
Developed by freedesktop.org (MIME mapping) / Dave Coffin (dcraw tool)
Released 1997
Magic Bytes
Varies by vendor format
Full Generic-RAW reference →
RealNetworks RealPix
image/vnd.rn-realpix
Extension
.rp
Container IMFL (XML Markup)
Compression Uncompressed (Plain Text Markup)
Algorithm
None (Plain Text)
Color Depth Dependent on referenced images
Developed by RealNetworks
Released 1998
Magic Bytes
3C 69 6D 66 6C
Full RealPix reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser Generic-RAW RealPix
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
Generic-RAW

Generic-RAW Strengths

  • Provides a unified, highly useful catch-all MIME type for application developers who just need to know if a file is a raw image, rather than tracking 50+ individual camera extensions
  • Deeply integrated into the Linux desktop ecosystem, ensuring file manager thumbnails work seamlessly via tools like ufraw-thumbnailer
Limitations
  • Not an official IANA standard
  • Can cause conflicts where standard TIFF files are misidentified as raw camera data by over-aggressive MIME sniffers
  • The underlying 'dcraw' tool was abandoned by its creator in 2018 (though its successor, LibRaw, continues to maintain the ecosystem)
RealPix

RealPix Strengths

  • Allowed for 'Ken Burns'-style animated slideshows at a fraction of the bandwidth required for actual video, crucial for 1990s dial-up connections
  • Plain text XML architecture made it easy for developers and hobbyists to hand-code complex multimedia presentations
  • Perfectly synchronized with RealAudio streams using SMIL-like timing parameters
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and heavily reliant on the proprietary, defunct RealPlayer browser plugin
  • Not a true image format, causing confusion when handled by standard image processing libraries which expect binary pixel data
  • Lacks modern CSS or HTML5 canvas equivalents without completely rewriting the presentation logic

When to choose which format

Generic-RAW
Use Generic-RAW when…
  • Linux Desktop File Associations (GNOME/KDE)
  • Thumbnail Generation for Raw Images (UFRaw/LibRaw)
  • Server-side Image Processing Fallbacks
RealPix
Use RealPix when…
  • Historical Dial-up Streaming Presentations
  • RealPlayer Slideshows
  • Bandwidth-efficient 'Video' Alternatives (late 1990s)
Share this comparison