Image MIME Reference
Generic-RAW
Digital Camera Raw (Generic Linux MIME)
image/x-dcraw
VS
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
MODI
A complete technical comparison of Digital Camera Raw (Generic Linux MIME) and Microsoft Document Imaging — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | Generic-RAW | MODI |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
Digital Camera Raw (Generic Linux MIME)
image/x-dcraw
Extension
.raw
Container
Varies (Predominantly TIFF/EP)
Compression
Lossless / Uncompressed
Algorithm
Varies (Often Lossless JPEG ITU-T81 or uncompressed)
Color Depth
12-bit, 14-bit, 16-bit
Developed by
freedesktop.org (MIME mapping) / Dave Coffin (dcraw tool)
Released
1997
Magic Bytes
Varies by vendor format
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container
TIFF Variant
Compression
LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | Generic-RAW | MODI |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
Generic-RAW
Generic-RAW Strengths
- Provides a unified, highly useful catch-all MIME type for application developers who just need to know if a file is a raw image, rather than tracking 50+ individual camera extensions
- Deeply integrated into the Linux desktop ecosystem, ensuring file manager thumbnails work seamlessly via tools like ufraw-thumbnailer
Limitations
- Not an official IANA standard
- Can cause conflicts where standard TIFF files are misidentified as raw camera data by over-aggressive MIME sniffers
- The underlying 'dcraw' tool was abandoned by its creator in 2018 (though its successor, LibRaw, continues to maintain the ecosystem)
MODI
MODI Strengths
- Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
- Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
- Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
- Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities
When to choose which format
Generic-RAW
Use Generic-RAW when…
- Linux Desktop File Associations (GNOME/KDE)
- Thumbnail Generation for Raw Images (UFRaw/LibRaw)
- Server-side Image Processing Fallbacks
MODI
Use MODI when…
- Legacy Scanned Document Archival
- Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
- Embedded OCR Text Storage