Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
Generic-RAW

Digital Camera Raw (Generic Linux MIME)

image/x-dcraw
VS

JPEG 2000 Core Image File

image/jp2
JPEG-2000

A complete technical comparison of Digital Camera Raw (Generic Linux MIME) and JPEG 2000 Core Image File — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

JPEG-2000 wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature Generic-RAW JPEG-2000
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support Yes Yes
EXIF Metadata Yes Yes
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
Digital Camera Raw (Generic Linux MIME)
image/x-dcraw
Extension
.raw
Container Varies (Predominantly TIFF/EP)
Compression Lossless / Uncompressed
Algorithm
Varies (Often Lossless JPEG ITU-T81 or uncompressed)
Color Depth 12-bit, 14-bit, 16-bit
Developed by freedesktop.org (MIME mapping) / Dave Coffin (dcraw tool)
Released 1997
Magic Bytes
Varies by vendor format
Full Generic-RAW reference →
JPEG 2000 Core Image File
image/jp2
Extension
.jp2.j2k.jpf.jpx.jpm
Container JP2 (ISO/IEC 15444-1)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group
Released 2000
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A
Full JPEG-2000 reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser Generic-RAW JPEG-2000
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
✓ 5+
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
Generic-RAW

Generic-RAW Strengths

  • Provides a unified, highly useful catch-all MIME type for application developers who just need to know if a file is a raw image, rather than tracking 50+ individual camera extensions
  • Deeply integrated into the Linux desktop ecosystem, ensuring file manager thumbnails work seamlessly via tools like ufraw-thumbnailer
Limitations
  • Not an official IANA standard
  • Can cause conflicts where standard TIFF files are misidentified as raw camera data by over-aggressive MIME sniffers
  • The underlying 'dcraw' tool was abandoned by its creator in 2018 (though its successor, LibRaw, continues to maintain the ecosystem)
JPEG-2000

JPEG-2000 Strengths

  • Superior compression efficiency over baseline JPEG without introducing blocking artifacts
  • True mathematically lossless compression available in the same format
  • Extremely scalable: a single file can be decoded at various resolutions (thumbnails to full size) without loading the entire file
Limitations
  • Very poor native web browser support prevents it from being a web standard
  • High computational complexity makes encoding and decoding significantly slower than JPEG
  • Early patent concerns and complex licensing hindered its initial adoption rate

When to choose which format

Generic-RAW
Use Generic-RAW when…
  • Linux Desktop File Associations (GNOME/KDE)
  • Thumbnail Generation for Raw Images (UFRaw/LibRaw)
  • Server-side Image Processing Fallbacks
JPEG-2000
Use JPEG-2000 when…
  • Digital Cinema (DCP)
  • Medical Imaging (DICOM)
  • Geospatial Data
  • Archival Preservation
Share this comparison