Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
G3-Fax

Group 3 Fax Image

image/g3fax
VS

North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax

image/naplps
NAPLPS

A complete technical comparison of Group 3 Fax Image and North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature G3-Fax NAPLPS
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No Yes
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
Group 3 Fax Image
image/g3fax
Extension
.g3
Container Raw Bitstream
Compression Lossless (CCITT Group 3)
Algorithm
CCITT Group 3 (Modified Huffman / READ)
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome)
Developed by CCITT (now ITU-T) / IETF
Released 1980
Magic Bytes
None (Raw Bitstream)
Full G3-Fax reference →
North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax
image/naplps
Extension
.nap.naplps
Container NAPLPS Byte Stream
Compression Uncompressed (Tokenized ASCII Commands)
Algorithm
None (Coordinate encoding)
Color Depth 16-color palette (Indexed from larger color spaces)
Developed by ANSI / CSA (Based on Canadian CRC's Telidon)
Released 1983
Magic Bytes
1B (Variable / ESC sequences)
Full NAPLPS reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser G3-Fax NAPLPS
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
G3-Fax

G3-Fax Strengths

  • Extremely efficient compression for 1-bit black-and-white text and line art
  • Standardized via RFC 1494 for email and internet fax transmission
  • Low bandwidth requirements
Limitations
  • Raw format lacks metadata (such as image width and resolution), requiring out-of-band information to decode accurately
  • Strictly limited to 1-bit monochrome imagery
  • Zero native web browser support
NAPLPS

NAPLPS Strengths

  • Extremely bandwidth-efficient, enabling colorful graphical interfaces over early 300 baud dial-up connections
  • Resolution-independent vector scaling allowed the exact same file to be displayed accurately on varied early PC monitors and television sets
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported by modern web technologies
  • Relies heavily on stateful parsing and terminal emulators rather than straightforward file decoding
  • Easily misidentified by MIME sniffers as plain text or generic binary streams due to the lack of a standardized file header

When to choose which format

G3-Fax
Use G3-Fax when…
  • Telefacsimile (Fax) Transmission
  • Internet Fax (T.37)
  • Document Archiving
  • Telephony Systems
NAPLPS
Use NAPLPS when…
  • 1980s Videotex Services
  • Prodigy Online Service Graphics
  • Historical BBS Terminal Graphics
  • Legacy Teletext Broadcasts
Share this comparison