Image MIME Reference
G3-Fax
Group 3 Fax Image
image/g3fax
VS
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream
image/jphc
HTJ2K-Codestream
A complete technical comparison of Group 3 Fax Image and High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | G3-Fax | HTJ2K-Codestream |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
Group 3 Fax Image
image/g3fax
Extension
.g3
Container
Raw Bitstream
Compression
Lossless (CCITT Group 3)
Algorithm
CCITT Group 3 (Modified Huffman / READ)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome)
Developed by
CCITT (now ITU-T) / IETF
Released
1980
Magic Bytes
None (Raw Bitstream)
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream
image/jphc
Extension
.jhc
Container
None (Raw Codestream)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2019
Magic Bytes
FF 4F FF 51
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | G3-Fax | HTJ2K-Codestream |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
G3-Fax
G3-Fax Strengths
- Extremely efficient compression for 1-bit black-and-white text and line art
- Standardized via RFC 1494 for email and internet fax transmission
- Low bandwidth requirements
Limitations
- Raw format lacks metadata (such as image width and resolution), requiring out-of-band information to decode accurately
- Strictly limited to 1-bit monochrome imagery
- Zero native web browser support
HTJ2K-Codestream
HTJ2K-Codestream Strengths
- Extremely fast encoding and decoding capabilities due to the parallelizable block coder
- Minimal file overhead since it lacks container headers and metadata
- Ideal for streaming applications or embedded systems where parsing a full container is unnecessary
Limitations
- Lacks standard metadata support (like EXIF, XMP, or ICC color profiles) since there is no container structure
- Zero native web browser compatibility
- Difficult to distinguish from standard JPEG 2000 codestreams without deeply parsing the internal marker segments
When to choose which format
G3-Fax
Use G3-Fax when…
- Telefacsimile (Fax) Transmission
- Internet Fax (T.37)
- Document Archiving
- Telephony Systems
HTJ2K-Codestream
Use HTJ2K-Codestream when…
- Medical Imaging Pipelines
- Geospatial Data Streaming
- Digital Cinema
- Embedded Systems