Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
Fuji-RAF

Fujifilm RAW Image

image/x-fuji-raf
VS

AutoCAD Slide

image/vnd.sld
SLD

A complete technical comparison of Fujifilm RAW Image and AutoCAD Slide — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature Fuji-RAF SLD
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
Fujifilm RAW Image
image/x-fuji-raf
Extension
.raf
Container Proprietary RAF Container
Compression Uncompressed / Lossless Compressed / Lossy Compressed (Modern firmware)
Algorithm
NoneProprietary LosslessProprietary Lossy
Color Depth 14-bit (Per Channel - X-Series), 16-bit (Per Channel - GFX Series)
Developed by Fujifilm Corporation
Released 2000
Magic Bytes
46 55 4A 49 46 49 4C 4D 43 43 44 2D 52 41 57 20
Full Fuji-RAF reference →
AutoCAD Slide
image/vnd.sld
Extension
.sld
Container AutoCAD Slide Container
Compression Uncompressed (Vector Instructions)
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 8-bit (AutoCAD Indexed Color)
Developed by Autodesk, Inc.
Released 1980s
Magic Bytes
41 75 74 6F 43 41 44 20 53 6C 69 64 65 0D 0A 1A 00
Full SLD reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser Fuji-RAF SLD
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
Fuji-RAF

Fuji-RAF Strengths

  • Retains absolute maximum sensor data, enabling massive shadow recovery and highlight protection compared to compressed in-camera JPEGs
  • Stores proprietary Fujifilm Film Simulation metadata (like Classic Chrome or Acros), allowing editors to perfectly replicate in-camera aesthetics
  • Very distinct and reliable magic header makes programmatic file detection foolproof
Limitations
  • Proprietary format requires continuous updates to third-party software (like Lightroom) whenever Fujifilm releases a new camera
  • The X-Trans sensor matrix requires highly specialized demosaicing algorithms that are extremely computationally expensive, leading to slower import and rendering times
  • Completely unsupported in standard web browsers and basic operating system image viewers
SLD

SLD Strengths

  • Allowed for instantaneous loading of highly complex architectural and engineering blueprints on low-memory MS-DOS systems
  • Easy-to-parse binary structure containing simple opcodes for drawing vectors and polygons
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and heavily fragmented, largely replaced by PDF and lightweight web-based DXF viewers
  • Destructive 'snapshot' format irrevocably strips all useful, editable CAD geometry data from the original drawing
  • Zero support in web browsers or standard image processing libraries

When to choose which format

Fuji-RAF
Use Fuji-RAF when…
  • Professional Digital Photography
  • Fujifilm X-Trans Sensor Image Archival
  • High Dynamic Range (HDR) Post-Processing
SLD
Use SLD when…
  • Legacy AutoCAD Slideshows
  • AutoCAD Custom Icon Menus
  • Historical CAD Archival

More comparisons

Fuji-RAF vs ACES → SLD vs ACES → Fuji-RAF vs APNG → SLD vs APNG → Fuji-RAF vs AVCI → SLD vs AVCI → Fuji-RAF vs AVCS → SLD vs AVCS → Fuji-RAF vs AVIF → SLD vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison