Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
Fuji-RAF

Fujifilm RAW Image

image/x-fuji-raf
VS

Silicon Graphics Image

image/x-rgb
SGI-RGB

A complete technical comparison of Fujifilm RAW Image and Silicon Graphics Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature Fuji-RAF SGI-RGB
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
Fujifilm RAW Image
image/x-fuji-raf
Extension
.raf
Container Proprietary RAF Container
Compression Uncompressed / Lossless Compressed / Lossy Compressed (Modern firmware)
Algorithm
NoneProprietary LosslessProprietary Lossy
Color Depth 14-bit (Per Channel - X-Series), 16-bit (Per Channel - GFX Series)
Developed by Fujifilm Corporation
Released 2000
Magic Bytes
46 55 4A 49 46 49 4C 4D 43 43 44 2D 52 41 57 20
Full Fuji-RAF reference →
Silicon Graphics Image
image/x-rgb
Extension
.rgb.sgi.rgba.bw.int.inta
Container SGI Image Header (512 bytes)
Compression Uncompressed / Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Algorithm
NoneScanline RLE
Color Depth 8-bit (Per Channel), 16-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Silicon Graphics, Inc. (Paul Haeberli)
Released 1988
Magic Bytes
01 DA
Full SGI-RGB reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser Fuji-RAF SGI-RGB
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
Fuji-RAF

Fuji-RAF Strengths

  • Retains absolute maximum sensor data, enabling massive shadow recovery and highlight protection compared to compressed in-camera JPEGs
  • Stores proprietary Fujifilm Film Simulation metadata (like Classic Chrome or Acros), allowing editors to perfectly replicate in-camera aesthetics
  • Very distinct and reliable magic header makes programmatic file detection foolproof
Limitations
  • Proprietary format requires continuous updates to third-party software (like Lightroom) whenever Fujifilm releases a new camera
  • The X-Trans sensor matrix requires highly specialized demosaicing algorithms that are extremely computationally expensive, leading to slower import and rendering times
  • Completely unsupported in standard web browsers and basic operating system image viewers
SGI-RGB

SGI-RGB Strengths

  • Supports 16-bit precision per channel and an embedded alpha channel, making it ideal for the demanding compositing workflows of 1990s cinema VFX
  • The scanline-based RLE compression was exceptionally fast to decode on classic MIPS-based SGI workstations
  • Features a straightforward 512-byte header, making it relatively easy to parse and write custom decoders in C or Python
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern web environments
  • Replaced entirely by TIFF, OpenEXR, and PNG in modern visual effects and 3D rendering pipelines
  • Lacks support for modern color management via ICC profiles or advanced EXIF metadata

When to choose which format

Fuji-RAF
Use Fuji-RAF when…
  • Professional Digital Photography
  • Fujifilm X-Trans Sensor Image Archival
  • High Dynamic Range (HDR) Post-Processing
SGI-RGB
Use SGI-RGB when…
  • Legacy 3D Animation and VFX Textures
  • Silicon Graphics IRIX Workstation Archival
  • 1990s Medical Imaging

More comparisons

Fuji-RAF vs ACES → SGI-RGB vs ACES → Fuji-RAF vs APNG → SGI-RGB vs APNG → Fuji-RAF vs AVCI → SGI-RGB vs AVCI → Fuji-RAF vs AVCS → SGI-RGB vs AVCS → Fuji-RAF vs AVIF → SGI-RGB vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison