Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
Fuji-RAF

Fujifilm RAW Image

image/x-fuji-raf
VS

RealNetworks RealPix

image/vnd.rn-realpix
RealPix

A complete technical comparison of Fujifilm RAW Image and RealNetworks RealPix — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature Fuji-RAF RealPix
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No Yes
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
Fujifilm RAW Image
image/x-fuji-raf
Extension
.raf
Container Proprietary RAF Container
Compression Uncompressed / Lossless Compressed / Lossy Compressed (Modern firmware)
Algorithm
NoneProprietary LosslessProprietary Lossy
Color Depth 14-bit (Per Channel - X-Series), 16-bit (Per Channel - GFX Series)
Developed by Fujifilm Corporation
Released 2000
Magic Bytes
46 55 4A 49 46 49 4C 4D 43 43 44 2D 52 41 57 20
Full Fuji-RAF reference →
RealNetworks RealPix
image/vnd.rn-realpix
Extension
.rp
Container IMFL (XML Markup)
Compression Uncompressed (Plain Text Markup)
Algorithm
None (Plain Text)
Color Depth Dependent on referenced images
Developed by RealNetworks
Released 1998
Magic Bytes
3C 69 6D 66 6C
Full RealPix reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser Fuji-RAF RealPix
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
Fuji-RAF

Fuji-RAF Strengths

  • Retains absolute maximum sensor data, enabling massive shadow recovery and highlight protection compared to compressed in-camera JPEGs
  • Stores proprietary Fujifilm Film Simulation metadata (like Classic Chrome or Acros), allowing editors to perfectly replicate in-camera aesthetics
  • Very distinct and reliable magic header makes programmatic file detection foolproof
Limitations
  • Proprietary format requires continuous updates to third-party software (like Lightroom) whenever Fujifilm releases a new camera
  • The X-Trans sensor matrix requires highly specialized demosaicing algorithms that are extremely computationally expensive, leading to slower import and rendering times
  • Completely unsupported in standard web browsers and basic operating system image viewers
RealPix

RealPix Strengths

  • Allowed for 'Ken Burns'-style animated slideshows at a fraction of the bandwidth required for actual video, crucial for 1990s dial-up connections
  • Plain text XML architecture made it easy for developers and hobbyists to hand-code complex multimedia presentations
  • Perfectly synchronized with RealAudio streams using SMIL-like timing parameters
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and heavily reliant on the proprietary, defunct RealPlayer browser plugin
  • Not a true image format, causing confusion when handled by standard image processing libraries which expect binary pixel data
  • Lacks modern CSS or HTML5 canvas equivalents without completely rewriting the presentation logic

When to choose which format

Fuji-RAF
Use Fuji-RAF when…
  • Professional Digital Photography
  • Fujifilm X-Trans Sensor Image Archival
  • High Dynamic Range (HDR) Post-Processing
RealPix
Use RealPix when…
  • Historical Dial-up Streaming Presentations
  • RealPlayer Slideshows
  • Bandwidth-efficient 'Video' Alternatives (late 1990s)
Share this comparison