Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
Fuji-RAF

Fujifilm RAW Image

image/x-fuji-raf
VS

RealNetworks RealFlash

image/vnd.rn-realflash
RealFlash

A complete technical comparison of Fujifilm RAW Image and RealNetworks RealFlash — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature Fuji-RAF RealFlash
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No Yes
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
Fujifilm RAW Image
image/x-fuji-raf
Extension
.raf
Container Proprietary RAF Container
Compression Uncompressed / Lossless Compressed / Lossy Compressed (Modern firmware)
Algorithm
NoneProprietary LosslessProprietary Lossy
Color Depth 14-bit (Per Channel - X-Series), 16-bit (Per Channel - GFX Series)
Developed by Fujifilm Corporation
Released 2000
Magic Bytes
46 55 4A 49 46 49 4C 4D 43 43 44 2D 52 41 57 20
Full Fuji-RAF reference →
RealNetworks RealFlash
image/vnd.rn-realflash
Extension
Container RealMedia / SWF
Compression Vector (Flash) / RealAudio Compression
Algorithm
Macromedia Vector CompressionDeflate (Zlib)
Color Depth 8-bit, 24-bit, 32-bit
Developed by RealNetworks & Macromedia
Released 1997
Magic Bytes
46 57 53 (FWS - Standard Flash) or 2E 52 4D 46 (.RMF - RealMedia Container)
Full RealFlash reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser Fuji-RAF RealFlash
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
Fuji-RAF

Fuji-RAF Strengths

  • Retains absolute maximum sensor data, enabling massive shadow recovery and highlight protection compared to compressed in-camera JPEGs
  • Stores proprietary Fujifilm Film Simulation metadata (like Classic Chrome or Acros), allowing editors to perfectly replicate in-camera aesthetics
  • Very distinct and reliable magic header makes programmatic file detection foolproof
Limitations
  • Proprietary format requires continuous updates to third-party software (like Lightroom) whenever Fujifilm releases a new camera
  • The X-Trans sensor matrix requires highly specialized demosaicing algorithms that are extremely computationally expensive, leading to slower import and rendering times
  • Completely unsupported in standard web browsers and basic operating system image viewers
RealFlash

RealFlash Strengths

  • Allowed complex, interactive vector animations to stream smoothly over 28.8k dial-up modems
  • Perfectly synchronized streaming audio with timeline-based animations, which was revolutionary in 1997
Limitations
  • Heavily reliant on proprietary browser plugins (RealPlayer), which were notoriously bloated
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported on the modern web
  • Tightly coupled server-client architecture required expensive RealServer licenses to host

When to choose which format

Fuji-RAF
Use Fuji-RAF when…
  • Professional Digital Photography
  • Fujifilm X-Trans Sensor Image Archival
  • High Dynamic Range (HDR) Post-Processing
RealFlash
Use RealFlash when…
  • Historical Dial-up Web Animation
  • Late-1990s Interactive Music Videos
  • Streaming Vector Graphics

More comparisons

Fuji-RAF vs ACES → RealFlash vs ACES → Fuji-RAF vs APNG → RealFlash vs APNG → Fuji-RAF vs AVCI → RealFlash vs AVCI → Fuji-RAF vs AVCS → RealFlash vs AVCS → Fuji-RAF vs AVIF → RealFlash vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison