Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
Fuji-RAF

Fujifilm RAW Image

image/x-fuji-raf
VS

QuickTime Image Format

image/x-quicktime
QTIF

A complete technical comparison of Fujifilm RAW Image and QuickTime Image Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature Fuji-RAF QTIF
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
Fujifilm RAW Image
image/x-fuji-raf
Extension
.raf
Container Proprietary RAF Container
Compression Uncompressed / Lossless Compressed / Lossy Compressed (Modern firmware)
Algorithm
NoneProprietary LosslessProprietary Lossy
Color Depth 14-bit (Per Channel - X-Series), 16-bit (Per Channel - GFX Series)
Developed by Fujifilm Corporation
Released 2000
Magic Bytes
46 55 4A 49 46 49 4C 4D 43 43 44 2D 52 41 57 20
Full Fuji-RAF reference →
QuickTime Image Format
image/x-quicktime
Extension
.qtif.qti.qif
Container QuickTime Atom Container
Compression Varies (JPEG, SMC, Apple Video, Cinepak, Uncompressed)
Algorithm
QuickTime Image Compression Manager (ICM) Codecs
Color Depth 1-bit to 32-bit (Varies depending on the enclosed codec)
Developed by Apple Computer, Inc.
Released 1991
Magic Bytes
Varies (Typically begins with a 32-bit size integer followed by 69 64 73 63 ('idsc'))
Full QTIF reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser Fuji-RAF QTIF
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
Fuji-RAF

Fuji-RAF Strengths

  • Retains absolute maximum sensor data, enabling massive shadow recovery and highlight protection compared to compressed in-camera JPEGs
  • Stores proprietary Fujifilm Film Simulation metadata (like Classic Chrome or Acros), allowing editors to perfectly replicate in-camera aesthetics
  • Very distinct and reliable magic header makes programmatic file detection foolproof
Limitations
  • Proprietary format requires continuous updates to third-party software (like Lightroom) whenever Fujifilm releases a new camera
  • The X-Trans sensor matrix requires highly specialized demosaicing algorithms that are extremely computationally expensive, leading to slower import and rendering times
  • Completely unsupported in standard web browsers and basic operating system image viewers
QTIF

QTIF Strengths

  • Extremely flexible architecture allowing it to encapsulate virtually any image compression algorithm available on the host machine
  • Supported 32-bit images with alpha channels (transparency) long before PNG became an established standard
Limitations
  • Fundamentally tied to Apple's deprecated QuickTime architecture, rendering the files almost entirely unreadable on modern systems without specialized legacy software or FFmpeg
  • The 'wrapper' nature of the format means that even if a parser can read the QTIF container, it may fail to render the image if it lacks the specific proprietary codec (like Apple SMC) used to compress the pixel data
  • Zero native support in modern web browsers

When to choose which format

Fuji-RAF
Use Fuji-RAF when…
  • Professional Digital Photography
  • Fujifilm X-Trans Sensor Image Archival
  • High Dynamic Range (HDR) Post-Processing
QTIF
Use QTIF when…
  • Classic Mac OS Applications and Backgrounds
  • QuickTime VR Panorama Textures
  • 1990s CD-ROM Multimedia Assets

More comparisons

Fuji-RAF vs ACES → QTIF vs ACES → Fuji-RAF vs APNG → QTIF vs APNG → Fuji-RAF vs AVCI → QTIF vs AVCI → Fuji-RAF vs AVCS → QTIF vs AVCS → Fuji-RAF vs AVIF → QTIF vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison