Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
Fuji-RAF

Fujifilm RAW Image

image/x-fuji-raf
VS

High Efficiency Image File Format Sequence

image/heif-sequence
HEIF-Sequence

A complete technical comparison of Fujifilm RAW Image and High Efficiency Image File Format Sequence — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature Fuji-RAF HEIF-Sequence
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No Yes
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes Yes
EXIF Metadata Yes Yes
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
Fujifilm RAW Image
image/x-fuji-raf
Extension
.raf
Container Proprietary RAF Container
Compression Uncompressed / Lossless Compressed / Lossy Compressed (Modern firmware)
Algorithm
NoneProprietary LosslessProprietary Lossy
Color Depth 14-bit (Per Channel - X-Series), 16-bit (Per Channel - GFX Series)
Developed by Fujifilm Corporation
Released 2000
Magic Bytes
46 55 4A 49 46 49 4C 4D 43 43 44 2D 52 41 57 20
Full Fuji-RAF reference →
High Efficiency Image File Format Sequence
image/heif-sequence
Extension
.heifs.heif.hif
Container HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 14496-12)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Codec Agnostic (HEVC, AVC, JPEG, AV1)
Color Depth 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit
Developed by Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG)
Released 2015
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 6D 73 66 31
Full HEIF-Sequence reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser Fuji-RAF HEIF-Sequence
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
Fuji-RAF

Fuji-RAF Strengths

  • Retains absolute maximum sensor data, enabling massive shadow recovery and highlight protection compared to compressed in-camera JPEGs
  • Stores proprietary Fujifilm Film Simulation metadata (like Classic Chrome or Acros), allowing editors to perfectly replicate in-camera aesthetics
  • Very distinct and reliable magic header makes programmatic file detection foolproof
Limitations
  • Proprietary format requires continuous updates to third-party software (like Lightroom) whenever Fujifilm releases a new camera
  • The X-Trans sensor matrix requires highly specialized demosaicing algorithms that are extremely computationally expensive, leading to slower import and rendering times
  • Completely unsupported in standard web browsers and basic operating system image viewers
HEIF-Sequence

HEIF-Sequence Strengths

  • Codec-agnostic container allows for extreme flexibility when storing multi-frame photographic data
  • Maintains the space-saving benefits of ISOBMFF shared frame data blocks
  • Excellent for archiving computational photography workloads like exposure brackets or focal stacks
Limitations
  • Codec ambiguity means a decoder might be able to parse the container but fail to decode the underlying pixels
  • Zero native web browser support
  • Complex container structure requires specialized parsing libraries to extract individual frames

When to choose which format

Fuji-RAF
Use Fuji-RAF when…
  • Professional Digital Photography
  • Fujifilm X-Trans Sensor Image Archival
  • High Dynamic Range (HDR) Post-Processing
HEIF-Sequence
Use HEIF-Sequence when…
  • Burst Photography
  • Focal Stacking
  • Exposure Bracketing
  • Time-Lapse Data

More comparisons

Fuji-RAF vs ACES → HEIF-Sequence vs ACES → Fuji-RAF vs APNG → HEIF-Sequence vs APNG → Fuji-RAF vs AVCI → HEIF-Sequence vs AVCI → Fuji-RAF vs AVCS → HEIF-Sequence vs AVCS → Fuji-RAF vs AVIF → HEIF-Sequence vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison