Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
FST-Image

FAST Search & Transfer Image

image/vnd.fst
VS

Sony SRF Raw Image

image/x-sony-srf
Sony-SRF

A complete technical comparison of FAST Search & Transfer Image and Sony SRF Raw Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature FST-Image Sony-SRF
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile ✕ No Yes
FAST Search & Transfer Image
image/vnd.fst
Extension
.fst
Container Proprietary FAST Container
Compression Proprietary
Algorithm
Unknown (Proprietary FAST encoding)
Color Depth Unknown
Developed by FAST Search & Transfer ASA (Arild Fuldseth)
Released 2000
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary)
Full FST-Image reference →
Sony SRF Raw Image
image/x-sony-srf
Extension
.srf
Container TIFF-based (Proprietary)
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 12-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Sony Corporation
Released 2003
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Full Sony-SRF reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser FST-Image Sony-SRF
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
FST-Image

FST-Image Strengths

  • Historically served as an optimized, compressed format for FAST's early multimedia and live streaming engines over constrained late-1990s bandwidth
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and non-functional in modern software ecosystems
  • Undocumented, closed-source binary structure with zero support in modern image processing libraries
  • Shares its file extension with several other distinct file types (such as FL Studio state files or FAST Search dictionaries), leading to easy misidentification
Sony-SRF

Sony-SRF Strengths

  • Retains perfectly raw, unprocessed sensor data from legacy early-2000s cameras, allowing modern raw processors to extract much better dynamic range and color than the camera's original internal JPEG engine could
  • Utilizes a standard TIFF container structure, ensuring broad compatibility with community-maintained open-source decoding libraries like LibRaw
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete format that has long been abandoned in favor of ARW
  • MIME detection via magic bytes is unreliable due to TIFF header spoofing, requiring deeper EXIF inspection for accurate routing
  • Cannot be natively viewed in web browsers or standard operating system image viewers without specialized decoders

When to choose which format

FST-Image
Use FST-Image when…
  • Historical FAST Enterprise Search Indexing
  • Legacy Proprietary Multimedia Streaming (late 1990s)
  • Internal Media Transmission
Sony-SRF
Use Sony-SRF when…
  • Legacy Sony Cyber-shot Photography
  • Non-destructive Image Post-Processing
  • Early 2000s Raw Imaging Archival
Share this comparison