Image MIME Reference
FST-Image
FAST Search & Transfer Image
image/vnd.fst
VS
JPEG Network Graphics
image/x-jng
JNG
A complete technical comparison of FAST Search & Transfer Image and JPEG Network Graphics — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | FST-Image | JNG |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
FAST Search & Transfer Image
image/vnd.fst
Extension
.fst
Container
Proprietary FAST Container
Compression
Proprietary
Algorithm
Unknown (Proprietary FAST encoding)
Color Depth
Unknown
Developed by
FAST Search & Transfer ASA (Arild Fuldseth)
Released
2000
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary)
JPEG Network Graphics
image/x-jng
Extension
.jng
Container
PNG-style Chunk Structure (JHDR, JDAT, IDAT, IEND)
Compression
Lossy (JPEG/DCT for color) / Lossless (Deflate for alpha mask)
Algorithm
JPEG (Discrete Cosine Transform)Deflate (LZ77)
Color Depth
8-bit, 12-bit, 24-bit (RGB), 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by
MNG Development Group (Glenn Randers-Pehrson et al.)
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
8B 4A 4E 47 0D 0A 1A 0A
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | FST-Image | JNG |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
FST-Image
FST-Image Strengths
- Historically served as an optimized, compressed format for FAST's early multimedia and live streaming engines over constrained late-1990s bandwidth
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and non-functional in modern software ecosystems
- Undocumented, closed-source binary structure with zero support in modern image processing libraries
- Shares its file extension with several other distinct file types (such as FL Studio state files or FAST Search dictionaries), leading to easy misidentification
JNG
JNG Strengths
- Solved a massive technical hurdle in the early 2000s by combining high-compression lossy photographic data with crisp, 8-bit alpha transparency
- Utilized the highly robust, extensible chunk-based architecture of the PNG format
- Provided an excellent, bandwidth-saving alternative to massive 32-bit transparent PNGs for web design
Limitations
- Failed to achieve critical mass; browser vendors largely abandoned the MNG/JNG standard due to implementation complexity
- Completely obsolete today, having been superseded by natively supported, superior formats like WebP, AVIF, and HEIC
- Decoding requires a hybrid engine that can parse PNG chunks while simultaneously decoding a JPEG stream and a Deflate stream, complicating software support
When to choose which format
FST-Image
Use FST-Image when…
- Historical FAST Enterprise Search Indexing
- Legacy Proprietary Multimedia Streaming (late 1990s)
- Internal Media Transmission
JNG
Use JNG when…
- Embedded frames in MNG animations
- Historical web graphics requiring lossy compression with transparency