Image MIME Reference
FST-Image
FAST Search & Transfer Image
image/vnd.fst
VS
JPEG 2000 Codestream
image/j2c
J2C
A complete technical comparison of FAST Search & Transfer Image and JPEG 2000 Codestream — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | FST-Image | J2C |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
FAST Search & Transfer Image
image/vnd.fst
Extension
.fst
Container
Proprietary FAST Container
Compression
Proprietary
Algorithm
Unknown (Proprietary FAST encoding)
Color Depth
Unknown
Developed by
FAST Search & Transfer ASA (Arild Fuldseth)
Released
2000
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary)
JPEG 2000 Codestream
image/j2c
Extension
.j2c.j2k.jpc
Container
None (Raw Bitstream)
Compression
JPEG 2000 (Discrete Wavelet Transform) / Lossless / Lossy
Algorithm
Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)
Color Depth
8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2000
Magic Bytes
FF 4F FF 51
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | FST-Image | J2C |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
FST-Image
FST-Image Strengths
- Historically served as an optimized, compressed format for FAST's early multimedia and live streaming engines over constrained late-1990s bandwidth
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and non-functional in modern software ecosystems
- Undocumented, closed-source binary structure with zero support in modern image processing libraries
- Shares its file extension with several other distinct file types (such as FL Studio state files or FAST Search dictionaries), leading to easy misidentification
J2C
J2C Strengths
- Provides state-of-the-art wavelet compression for high-end professional workflows (Digital Cinema)
- Allows for highly efficient progressive decoding (by resolution or quality layer) natively within the stream
- Supports lossless mathematical compression and high bit-depths (up to 16-bit per channel) natively
Limitations
- Lacks a standard container to store color space info or metadata, requiring external systems (like MXF or DICOM) to map colors correctly
- Extremely computationally expensive to encode and decode compared to standard DCT-based JPEG
- Zero web browser support
When to choose which format
FST-Image
Use FST-Image when…
- Historical FAST Enterprise Search Indexing
- Legacy Proprietary Multimedia Streaming (late 1990s)
- Internal Media Transmission
J2C
Use J2C when…
- Digital Cinema Packages (DCP)
- Medical Imaging (DICOM Payloads)
- Professional Broadcast and Archiving
- Embedded Hardware Encoding