Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
FST-Image

FAST Search & Transfer Image

image/vnd.fst
VS

Image Exchange Format

image/ief
IEF

A complete technical comparison of FAST Search & Transfer Image and Image Exchange Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature FST-Image IEF
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
FAST Search & Transfer Image
image/vnd.fst
Extension
.fst
Container Proprietary FAST Container
Compression Proprietary
Algorithm
Unknown (Proprietary FAST encoding)
Color Depth Unknown
Developed by FAST Search & Transfer ASA (Arild Fuldseth)
Released 2000
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary)
Full FST-Image reference →
Image Exchange Format
image/ief
Extension
.ief
Container TIFF Class B (TIFF-B)
Compression Lossless (MH, MR, MMR) / Uncompressed
Algorithm
MHMRMMRUncompressed
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome)
Developed by IETF Network Fax Working Group
Released 1992
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 (Little-endian) / 4D 4D 00 2A (Big-endian)
Full IEF reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser FST-Image IEF
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
FST-Image

FST-Image Strengths

  • Historically served as an optimized, compressed format for FAST's early multimedia and live streaming engines over constrained late-1990s bandwidth
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and non-functional in modern software ecosystems
  • Undocumented, closed-source binary structure with zero support in modern image processing libraries
  • Shares its file extension with several other distinct file types (such as FL Studio state files or FAST Search dictionaries), leading to easy misidentification
IEF

IEF Strengths

  • Provided a standard method for exchanging bi-level fax images during the early days of the Internet
  • Supported multi-page documents
  • Leveraged the highly resilient and well-documented TIFF container
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern computing environments
  • Strictly limited to 1-bit monochrome data, lacking color or grayscale capabilities
  • Magic bytes overlap completely with standard TIFF, making specific filetype detection difficult without parsing internal tags

When to choose which format

FST-Image
Use FST-Image when…
  • Historical FAST Enterprise Search Indexing
  • Legacy Proprietary Multimedia Streaming (late 1990s)
  • Internal Media Transmission
IEF
Use IEF when…
  • Legacy Fax Transmissions
  • Early Internet Gateways
  • Archival
Share this comparison