Image MIME Reference
FreeHand
Macromedia FreeHand Document
image/x-freehand
VS
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
MODI
A complete technical comparison of Macromedia FreeHand Document and Microsoft Document Imaging — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | FreeHand | MODI |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
Macromedia FreeHand Document
image/x-freehand
Extension
.fh.fh4.fh5.fh7.fh8.fh9.fh10.fh11.ft11
Container
Proprietary Binary (Aldus Graphic Document)
Compression
Uncompressed / Deflate (in later versions)
Algorithm
NoneDeflate (Optional in later versions)
Color Depth
Vector Data (RGB/CMYK)
Developed by
Altsys / Aldus / Macromedia
Released
1988
Magic Bytes
41 47 44 31 to 41 47 44 34
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container
TIFF Variant
Compression
LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | FreeHand | MODI |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
FreeHand
FreeHand Strengths
- Historically one of the most powerful and intuitive vector editors on the market, praised for multi-page support long before Adobe Illustrator implemented it
- Files are generally compact and self-contained
Limitations
- Completely abandoned proprietary format; Adobe actively blocked native import in modern versions of Illustrator
- No support in modern web browsers; must be converted to SVG
- Versioning fragmentation means parsers must account for wildly different binary structures depending on the specific .fhX extension used
MODI
MODI Strengths
- Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
- Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
- Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
- Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities
When to choose which format
FreeHand
Use FreeHand when…
- Legacy Graphic Design Portfolios
- Historical Desktop Publishing Archival
- Old Corporate Logo Vectors
MODI
Use MODI when…
- Legacy Scanned Document Archival
- Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
- Embedded OCR Text Storage