Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
FreeHand

Macromedia FreeHand Document

image/x-freehand
VS

JPEG 2000 Core Image File

image/jp2
JPEG-2000

A complete technical comparison of Macromedia FreeHand Document and JPEG 2000 Core Image File — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

JPEG-2000 wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature FreeHand JPEG-2000
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
Macromedia FreeHand Document
image/x-freehand
Extension
.fh.fh4.fh5.fh7.fh8.fh9.fh10.fh11.ft11
Container Proprietary Binary (Aldus Graphic Document)
Compression Uncompressed / Deflate (in later versions)
Algorithm
NoneDeflate (Optional in later versions)
Color Depth Vector Data (RGB/CMYK)
Developed by Altsys / Aldus / Macromedia
Released 1988
Magic Bytes
41 47 44 31 to 41 47 44 34
Full FreeHand reference →
JPEG 2000 Core Image File
image/jp2
Extension
.jp2.j2k.jpf.jpx.jpm
Container JP2 (ISO/IEC 15444-1)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group
Released 2000
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A
Full JPEG-2000 reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser FreeHand JPEG-2000
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
✓ 5+
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
FreeHand

FreeHand Strengths

  • Historically one of the most powerful and intuitive vector editors on the market, praised for multi-page support long before Adobe Illustrator implemented it
  • Files are generally compact and self-contained
Limitations
  • Completely abandoned proprietary format; Adobe actively blocked native import in modern versions of Illustrator
  • No support in modern web browsers; must be converted to SVG
  • Versioning fragmentation means parsers must account for wildly different binary structures depending on the specific .fhX extension used
JPEG-2000

JPEG-2000 Strengths

  • Superior compression efficiency over baseline JPEG without introducing blocking artifacts
  • True mathematically lossless compression available in the same format
  • Extremely scalable: a single file can be decoded at various resolutions (thumbnails to full size) without loading the entire file
Limitations
  • Very poor native web browser support prevents it from being a web standard
  • High computational complexity makes encoding and decoding significantly slower than JPEG
  • Early patent concerns and complex licensing hindered its initial adoption rate

When to choose which format

FreeHand
Use FreeHand when…
  • Legacy Graphic Design Portfolios
  • Historical Desktop Publishing Archival
  • Old Corporate Logo Vectors
JPEG-2000
Use JPEG-2000 when…
  • Digital Cinema (DCP)
  • Medical Imaging (DICOM)
  • Geospatial Data
  • Archival Preservation
Share this comparison