Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
FLIF

Free Lossless Image Format

image/flif
VS

Silicon Graphics Image

image/x-rgb
SGI-RGB

A complete technical comparison of Free Lossless Image Format and Silicon Graphics Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature FLIF SGI-RGB
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
Free Lossless Image Format
image/flif
Extension
.flif
Container FLIF Bitstream
Compression Lossless (MANIAC Entropy Coding)
Algorithm
MANIAC (Meta-Adaptive Near-zero Integer Arithmetic Coding)
Color Depth 1-bit to 16-bit (Per Channel), Grayscale, RGB, RGBA, CMYK
Developed by Jon Sneyers and Pieter Wuille (Cloudinary)
Released 2015
Magic Bytes
46 4C 49 46
Full FLIF reference →
Silicon Graphics Image
image/x-rgb
Extension
.rgb.sgi.rgba.bw.int.inta
Container SGI Image Header (512 bytes)
Compression Uncompressed / Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Algorithm
NoneScanline RLE
Color Depth 8-bit (Per Channel), 16-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Silicon Graphics, Inc. (Paul Haeberli)
Released 1988
Magic Bytes
01 DA
Full SGI-RGB reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser FLIF SGI-RGB
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
FLIF

FLIF Strengths

  • Achieves some of the highest lossless compression ratios ever developed for raster images
  • Incredible progressive decoding allows an image to be highly recognizable even after only 5% of the file has been downloaded
  • Supports animations and complex alpha channels losslessly
Limitations
  • Officially abandoned in favor of JPEG XL
  • Zero native support in web browsers or standard operating system previewers
  • Encoding speed can be significantly slower than standard PNG or WebP compression
SGI-RGB

SGI-RGB Strengths

  • Supports 16-bit precision per channel and an embedded alpha channel, making it ideal for the demanding compositing workflows of 1990s cinema VFX
  • The scanline-based RLE compression was exceptionally fast to decode on classic MIPS-based SGI workstations
  • Features a straightforward 512-byte header, making it relatively easy to parse and write custom decoders in C or Python
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern web environments
  • Replaced entirely by TIFF, OpenEXR, and PNG in modern visual effects and 3D rendering pipelines
  • Lacks support for modern color management via ICC profiles or advanced EXIF metadata

When to choose which format

FLIF
Use FLIF when…
  • Archival of Uncompressed Image Assets
  • Bandwidth-Constrained Progressive Image Loading (Historical)
  • Medical and Scientific Imaging Storage
SGI-RGB
Use SGI-RGB when…
  • Legacy 3D Animation and VFX Textures
  • Silicon Graphics IRIX Workstation Archival
  • 1990s Medical Imaging

More comparisons

FLIF vs ACES → SGI-RGB vs ACES → FLIF vs APNG → SGI-RGB vs APNG → FLIF vs AVCI → SGI-RGB vs AVCI → FLIF vs AVCS → SGI-RGB vs AVCS → FLIF vs AVIF → SGI-RGB vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison