Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
FLIF

Free Lossless Image Format

image/flif
VS

Portable Pixmap

image/x-portable-pixmap
PPM

A complete technical comparison of Free Lossless Image Format and Portable Pixmap — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature FLIF PPM
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support Yes Yes
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
Free Lossless Image Format
image/flif
Extension
.flif
Container FLIF Bitstream
Compression Lossless (MANIAC Entropy Coding)
Algorithm
MANIAC (Meta-Adaptive Near-zero Integer Arithmetic Coding)
Color Depth 1-bit to 16-bit (Per Channel), Grayscale, RGB, RGBA, CMYK
Developed by Jon Sneyers and Pieter Wuille (Cloudinary)
Released 2015
Magic Bytes
46 4C 49 46
Full FLIF reference →
Portable Pixmap
image/x-portable-pixmap
Extension
.ppm
Container Netpbm
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 24-bit (RGB), 48-bit (RGB High Color)
Developed by Jef Poskanzer (Netpbm Project)
Released 1988
Magic Bytes
50 33 (ASCII) or 50 36 (Binary)
Full PPM reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser FLIF PPM
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
FLIF

FLIF Strengths

  • Achieves some of the highest lossless compression ratios ever developed for raster images
  • Incredible progressive decoding allows an image to be highly recognizable even after only 5% of the file has been downloaded
  • Supports animations and complex alpha channels losslessly
Limitations
  • Officially abandoned in favor of JPEG XL
  • Zero native support in web browsers or standard operating system previewers
  • Encoding speed can be significantly slower than standard PNG or WebP compression
PPM

PPM Strengths

  • Absolute structural simplicity allows parsers and renderers (such as custom raytracers) to write directly to the format with virtually no overhead or external libraries
  • Supports 16-bit per channel (48-bit total) precision, preserving deep color accuracy before converting to final delivery formats
  • ASCII encoding ('P3') allows manual editing and visual inspection of RGB values directly within a text editor
Limitations
  • Zero compression results in astronomical file sizes, making it entirely impractical for web delivery or consumer storage
  • Does not natively support an alpha channel for transparency (this is handled by the newer PAM extension format within the Netpbm suite)
  • Lacks support for modern metadata standards like EXIF, XMP, or embedded ICC color profiles

When to choose which format

FLIF
Use FLIF when…
  • Archival of Uncompressed Image Assets
  • Bandwidth-Constrained Progressive Image Loading (Historical)
  • Medical and Scientific Imaging Storage
PPM
Use PPM when…
  • Intermediary Format for Image Format Conversion
  • Academic Computer Graphics and Raytracing Output
  • Unix/Linux Command-Line Image Pipelines

More comparisons

FLIF vs ACES → PPM vs ACES → FLIF vs APNG → PPM vs APNG → FLIF vs AVCI → PPM vs AVCI → FLIF vs AVCS → PPM vs AVCS → FLIF vs AVIF → PPM vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison